Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 00:20:34
Server time: 19:39:25, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (7): albaniansunited | HopesFor | luthorian3059 | Paulo Nogueira | RogueALD | VojmatDun | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Freedom of Information Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2594

Description[?]:

This bill will:

1) Give the courts the power to request information when needed even if the individual refuses to release said nformation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:42:30, June 18, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Information Act
Messagethe right to privacy should always be respected

Date13:49:28, June 18, 2008 CET
FromRepublican Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Freedom of Information Act
MessageWe in the PP do not believe this is about privacy or not. It's about actually solving cases which has troubled us. We will support this bill.

Date19:58:39, June 18, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Information Act
MessageThe right to privacy can be violated when a court sees it necessary as it may involve solving a case.

Date20:02:28, June 18, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Information Act
MessageThis is about privacy. The court can demand you tell things you dont want to tell anyone, like personal things, if the courts want to hear it.

Date20:03:37, June 18, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Information Act
MessageAnd that could have been the argument of a fasicst just as well, saying the right to privacy only applies when it dosent hinder anything else

Date20:18:24, June 18, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Information Act
MessageIf it helps solve crimes and put criminals behind bars, it should be done.

Date22:41:40, June 18, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Information Act
MessageWell if you monitor every citizen 24-7 that would probarbly solve some more crimes, so according to that logic you would fully support that

Date00:38:46, June 19, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Freedom of Information Act
MessageYou are not making sense now.

Date12:14:09, June 19, 2008 CET
FromRepublican Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Freedom of Information Act
MessageYou're overreacting to every single bill, LLP. It's time to look at practical views aswell, not just theoretic ones. It can be nice with privacy, but I wouldn't be offended telling personal things if it helped putting an criminal behind bars.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 95

no
  

Total Seats: 46

abstain
  

Total Seats: 9


Random fact: "Nation raiding" or a malevolent coordinated effort by a single user or group of users to interrupt the gameplay, significantly alter the culture or direction of a nation is strictly prohibited. Players interacting in nation raiding will be sanctioned.

Random quote: "Anarchism is not a romantic fable but the hardheaded realization, based on five thousand years of experience, that we cannot entrust the management of our lives to kings, priests, politicians, generals, and county commissioners." - Edward Abbey

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60