We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
Details
Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2595
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet, according to election laws: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=183773 http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=198268 (expires 2694) Here's the math (rounding in representation, but not in calculation): DSP: 155/600=.26>*13=3.36 > 3 IMF: 92/600=.15>*13=1.99 > 2 NPP: 89/600=.15>*13=1.93 > 2 AUP: 79/600=.13>*13=1.71 > 2 AFFS: 76/600=.13>*13=1.65 > 2 CP: 56/600=.09>*13=1.21 > 1 SCP: 53/600=.09*13=1.15 > 1 SIP: 0/600=.00*13=0.00 > 0 |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Revolutionary State Socialist Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Normand Pluralist Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Sekowan Communist Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Imperial Pluralism Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Revolutionary State Socialist Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Conservative Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Imperial Pluralism Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Normand Pluralist Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:12:01, June 19, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | Proposing a Cabinet, according to election laws: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=183773 http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=198268 (expires 2694) Here's the math (rounding in representation, but not in calculation): DSP: 155/600=.26>*13=3.36 > 3 IMF: 92/600=.15>*13=1.99 > 2 NPP: 89/600=.15>*13=1.93 > 2 AUP: 79/600=.13>*13=1.71 > 2 AFFS: 76/600=.13>*13=1.65 > 2 CP: 56/600=.09>*13=1.21 > 1 SCP: 53/600=.09*13=1.15 > 1 SIP: 0/600=.00*13=0.00 > 0 |
Date | 21:19:18, June 19, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | CP fully supports this cabinet and the inclusion of all parties. The party hopes everyone moves forward from previous quarrels for the betterment of Sekowo. |
Date | 00:30:11, June 20, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | Sorry; forgot to move this to a vote. |
Date | 01:11:24, June 20, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | Don't be sorry. I like to debate bills before voting. Even if this was unintentional. =) |
Date | 01:55:16, June 20, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | Since SCP is gone this won''t pass, so I'm gonna vote no, since as I said even if I vote yes it wont pass. |
Date | 01:55:58, June 20, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | So... Voting to be contrary? |
Date | 02:28:16, June 20, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | No, voting against because even if it could pass, it would mean several seats would be vacant. |
Date | 03:26:53, June 20, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | When did several become one? |
Date | 03:49:20, June 20, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | Hm, I must have moved the scroll bar up and down without realizing it making me think I saw more then one. |
Date | 04:12:54, June 20, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | Meh, I suppose I'll just vote yes since my vote bar is all alone. |
Date | 05:01:16, June 20, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | Realize that a no vote enables us to exclude you from further cabinets until the next election. |
Date | 05:08:50, June 20, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | If you did that you realize that IMF and I would completely stop practiving the proportional distribution thing since that would be an outright abuse. |
Date | 05:34:10, June 20, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | Not really. I'd like to see if this bill would pass anyway without the SCP. |
Date | 05:34:35, June 20, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | Anyway, if the IMF and DSP boycotted the cabinet proposals, it would hurt you two much more than the rest of us. |
Date | 06:24:38, June 20, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | I don't have any cabinet seats, so it would'nt affect me, and IMF does'nt hold alot either. I'm only voting yes because we have'nt had a consensus bill in awhile. |
Date | 00:27:54, June 21, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | OOC: DSP, remember, you did vote for the proportional cabinets. Don't be like SCP and just hate everyone else. It really ruins things. You have cabinet posts. You can do things with it. e.g. The next time I have transport, I am going to propose building a new highway. You can have that idea. |
Date | 00:42:51, June 21, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594 |
Message | OOC: It's not about the cabinet seats, rather that using my voting no on something that can't pass regardless of how I vote is an abuse of the authority to exclude a party. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 468 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 79 |
Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws. |
Random quote: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting that vote." - Unknown |