Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 03:27:00
Server time: 00:32:59, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): slon03 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2594

Details

Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2595

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet, according to election laws:
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=183773
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=198268 (expires 2694)

Here's the math (rounding in representation, but not in calculation):
DSP: 155/600=.26>*13=3.36 > 3
IMF: 92/600=.15>*13=1.99 > 2
NPP: 89/600=.15>*13=1.93 > 2
AUP: 79/600=.13>*13=1.71 > 2
AFFS: 76/600=.13>*13=1.65 > 2
CP: 56/600=.09>*13=1.21 > 1
SCP: 53/600=.09*13=1.15 > 1
SIP: 0/600=.00*13=0.00 > 0

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:12:01, June 19, 2008 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageProposing a Cabinet, according to election laws:
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=183773
http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=198268 (expires 2694)

Here's the math (rounding in representation, but not in calculation):
DSP: 155/600=.26>*13=3.36 > 3
IMF: 92/600=.15>*13=1.99 > 2
NPP: 89/600=.15>*13=1.93 > 2
AUP: 79/600=.13>*13=1.71 > 2
AFFS: 76/600=.13>*13=1.65 > 2
CP: 56/600=.09>*13=1.21 > 1
SCP: 53/600=.09*13=1.15 > 1
SIP: 0/600=.00*13=0.00 > 0

Date21:19:18, June 19, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageCP fully supports this cabinet and the inclusion of all parties. The party hopes everyone moves forward from previous quarrels for the betterment of Sekowo.

Date00:30:11, June 20, 2008 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageSorry; forgot to move this to a vote.

Date01:11:24, June 20, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageDon't be sorry. I like to debate bills before voting. Even if this was unintentional. =)

Date01:55:16, June 20, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageSince SCP is gone this won''t pass, so I'm gonna vote no, since as I said even if I vote yes it wont pass.

Date01:55:58, June 20, 2008 CET
From Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageSo... Voting to be contrary?

Date02:28:16, June 20, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageNo, voting against because even if it could pass, it would mean several seats would be vacant.

Date03:26:53, June 20, 2008 CET
From Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageWhen did several become one?

Date03:49:20, June 20, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageHm, I must have moved the scroll bar up and down without realizing it making me think I saw more then one.

Date04:12:54, June 20, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageMeh, I suppose I'll just vote yes since my vote bar is all alone.

Date05:01:16, June 20, 2008 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageRealize that a no vote enables us to exclude you from further cabinets until the next election.

Date05:08:50, June 20, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageIf you did that you realize that IMF and I would completely stop practiving the proportional distribution thing since that would be an outright abuse.

Date05:34:10, June 20, 2008 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageNot really. I'd like to see if this bill would pass anyway without the SCP.

Date05:34:35, June 20, 2008 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageAnyway, if the IMF and DSP boycotted the cabinet proposals, it would hurt you two much more than the rest of us.

Date06:24:38, June 20, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageI don't have any cabinet seats, so it would'nt affect me, and IMF does'nt hold alot either.

I'm only voting yes because we have'nt had a consensus bill in awhile.

Date00:27:54, June 21, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageOOC: DSP, remember, you did vote for the proportional cabinets. Don't be like SCP and just hate everyone else. It really ruins things. You have cabinet posts. You can do things with it. e.g. The next time I have transport, I am going to propose building a new highway. You can have that idea.

Date00:42:51, June 21, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2594
MessageOOC:
It's not about the cabinet seats, rather that using my voting no on something that can't pass regardless of how I vote is an abuse of the authority to exclude a party.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 468

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 79


    Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws.

    Random quote: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting that vote." - Unknown

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 83