We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: A "Free" Mordusia
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mordusian Austrian Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2597
Description[?]:
The human body is not some sort of vile construct, but the apex of evolution, something to be admired, not ashamed of. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Current: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Proposed: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding sexually explicit material on broadcast television.
Old value:: Sexually explicit material is not allowed, but nudity that is not sexually explicit is.
Current: Sexually explicit material is allowed, but violent or hard core pornography is banned.
Proposed: Sexually explicit material is allowed, but violent or hard core pornography is banned.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The time at which sexually explicit content may be shown on broadcast television (if allowed).
Old value:: Sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown during hours that very few children watch television
Current: Sexually explicit content or nudity may only be shown during hours that very few children watch television
Proposed: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:48:10, June 24, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party (UCF) | To | Debating the A "Free" Mordusia |
Message | We must oppose this as we feel it is in contradiction to the majority of Mordusian morals. |
Date | 16:28:33, June 24, 2008 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the A "Free" Mordusia |
Message | We ask both sides to lay out their arguments. We ask the FRP for a source as to their assertation, as different states have different views. |
Date | 22:13:16, June 24, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party (UCF) | To | Debating the A "Free" Mordusia |
Message | The PP's request is perfectly legitimate: Nudity is a certain state that is for private eyes, it must not be exhibited in public. Some people feel extremly disturbed by nudity and their number is quite large. If we compare this large amount to the tiny minority that wishes to be nude in public, the rights (to happyness) of more people would be set aside than in the curent state. Also, exhibition of public nudity is a principal that is not permited in neither islam, christianity or judaism which are the three largest religions in our country (OOC: see wiki page). Again the morals and values of these people are being set aside, the minority must not be treated any better, or worse than the majority. Finally there is the very large risk that parents be extremly unwilling to let their children watch pornography, and therefore it's mere avaivability is a bad thing. |
Date | 22:49:16, June 24, 2008 CET | From | Mordusian Austrian Union | To | Debating the A "Free" Mordusia |
Message | The FRP must understand that democracy needs to be more than two wolves and a sheep deciding on what is for dinner. Liberty is not something that can fall at the whims of the majority -- at its heart, a truly free society must be one that protects minority rights. The MAU does not feel that the government needs to tell people that nudity would not be allowed -- we would like to remind the FRP that there is no "right to not be offended." If a person does not feel comfortable allowing themselves to walk naked in public, then they won't. Liberty must be based on tolerance, and the exposure of the human body is hardly encroaching on someone's right to practice their religion. As for allowing children to see sexual content on the television, if the parents do not wish it, they are perfectly capable of not allowing their children to watch it, either by monitoring their TV watching, or acquiring a channel-limiter. The government is not supposed to be a parent, either by setting these sorts of trivial rules, or by providing a wallet for people to go to. The government is here for the sole purpose of securing the blessings of liberty for its people. |
Date | 23:06:58, June 24, 2008 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the A "Free" Mordusia |
Message | Tolerance is no longer tolerance if it is condemned by moral and natural law. Although we are progressives, we also believe in divine law, and the law of God must come before the laws and beliefs of man. |
Date | 00:18:48, June 25, 2008 CET | From | Christian Democrats Union | To | Debating the A "Free" Mordusia |
Message | We are undecided on articles 1 & 3, as we do not see nudity itself as a vile sin, but the sexual gratification that comes through it. We are strongly opposed to article 2 and must reject the bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 64 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 137 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset. |
Random quote: "God has cared for these trees, saved them from drought, disease, avalanches, and a thousand tempests and floods. But he cannot save them from fools." - John Muir |