We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Organ Donation Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Solidarity (IA)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2612
Description[?]:
Consent should not be "assumed" in regard to organ donation. Personal consent should be required. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning organ donations.
Old value:: Unless otherwise stated, consent is assumed.
Current: Organ donations are only legal with personal consent, next-of-kin may override personal consent.
Proposed: Organ donations are only legal with personal consent, next-of-kin may override personal consent.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:10:56, June 29, 2008 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Organ Donation Reform |
Message | Mr Speaker, There is no Christian reason for withholding organs that are no longer of use to their previous user, and that could save the life of another human being. |
Date | 19:12:55, July 24, 2008 CET | From | Neo-Imperial Peoples Vanguard Party (IA) | To | Debating the Organ Donation Reform |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Is it not defiling a dead man's body to take from them what they have not given express permission to give up? What is of a man's body is their's in life as it is in death. We should be respectful to the dead. I yield. |
Date | 14:27:36, July 25, 2008 CET | From | Solidarity (IA) | To | Debating the Organ Donation Reform |
Message | Mr Speaker, In general, consent should never be assumed on almost anything. |
Date | 14:33:11, July 25, 2008 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Organ Donation Reform |
Message | Mr Speaker, A dead man's soul has no use for his former body. This matter of "consent" encourages families to adopt heathen beliefs and pagan rituals involving the remains of the deceased: when they should rejoice that their loved one has gone to a better place. |
Date | 15:36:03, July 25, 2008 CET | From | Neo-Imperial Peoples Vanguard Party (IA) | To | Debating the Organ Donation Reform |
Message | Mr. Speaker, A body should be buried with respect to them not being defiled by a doctor. The Church has always allowed the last wish in the legal document of a will, just as we respect a deceased man's house we should respect his body, after all that was his first ownership on Earth, and what happens to it. If it is his wish to not have his body taken advantage of and made defiled then we should not stand in his way. I yield. |
Date | 16:05:07, July 25, 2008 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Organ Donation Reform |
Message | Mr Speaker, We believe that preserving the lives takes precedence over any heathen attachment to the deceased's remains. |
Date | 16:58:02, July 25, 2008 CET | From | Neo-Imperial Peoples Vanguard Party (IA) | To | Debating the Organ Donation Reform |
Message | Mr. Speaker, It is not heathen to believe that on Earth human beings have the right to private property. I yield. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 89 | |||
no | Total Seats: 62 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 24 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "The use of solar energy has not been opened up because the oil industry does not own the sun." - Ralph Nader |