We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601
Details
Submitted by[?]: Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2602
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
New Socialist Alliance
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Liberal Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Liberal Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the New Socialist Alliance
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Libertarian Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the 
Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Libertarian Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Genuine Progress Alliance
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Libertia Party (PrCoa)
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Monarchist Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Conservative Union
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Conservative Union
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:45:12, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Genuine Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601 |
| Message | We feel that this proposal was not created with the intention of finally resolving the Cabinet crisis in Aloria. We arrived at this conclusion due to the fact that the Monarchist Party was included in the list. Despite the fact that it is a very old party, it has not been able to effectively establish its presence to the Alorian people, as evidenced by their election record and the description of their stances on certain issues. Thus, we believe that the Monarchist Party should be excluded until it can show that it truly is capable of handling a government position. |
| Date | 17:13:39, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601 |
| Message | Oh c'mon. The MP got ONE seat, which is fitting considering their status in parliament and their lack of bill introduction over the past 5-6 election cycles. GP, you forget that point it seems. Plus, you received excellent seats. Stop stifling progress. Our cabinet is grossly out of date. Propose an even-handed cabinet if you think this one is no good and stop wasting time. |
| Date | 17:46:32, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Genuine Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601 |
| Message | No, they didn't. The last time they've acquired a seat, it was in 2195. Actually, we'd like to see the MP in the Cabinet, considering some of their legislative contributions. But the fact that they don't have a seat makes us wonder if they can take on the task. For the sake of unity in Aloria, we'll change our vote to YES. But we do hope that the other parties do vote on this bill. That's basically the problem of this bill; it included all of the parties in Aloria. This makes it hard for it to pass, since we need all of them to vote. (OOC: Honestly, I don't expect all of them to vote.) We'll also heed your advice and create our own cabinet proposal. Hopefully, we can finally have a Cabinet in Aloria. |
| Date | 17:48:53, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Genuine Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601 |
| Message | We also apologize to the Monarchist Party for our words. We know it was wrong of us to be a bit too judgmental. For that, we apologize/ |
| Date | 20:45:18, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Genuine Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601 |
| Message | Libertarian Party, If you did not wish to work with "communists", which I assume you are referring to GPA, SA, and other non-libertarian parties, then why did you vote YES to this proposal by the MLP but said NO to our proposal? The "communists" are still here in the proposal. And their placement is basically the same as that of our proposal. SA still gets Prime Minister and Environment. GPA gets Defence (alone!). And the Liberal Party would still have Science and Justice. In fact, we actually designed our proposal to give more priority to the ones in the majority, that being you and your libertarian colleagues. Our basis was simply the current Cabinet and this proposal by the MLP. Yet you rejected it because you would be working with "communists"? And yet you approved THIS proposal by the MLP even though you'll inevitably be working with "communists"? Libertarian Party, we request for your answer. - Genuine Progress Alliance |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 627 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 123 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "If you cannot convince a fascist, acquaint his head with the pavement." - Leon Trotsky |