Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 03:43:53
Server time: 08:16:06, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): albaniansunited | Svet-Aldegar | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601

Details

Submitted by[?]: Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2602

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:45:12, July 04, 2008 CET
FromGenuine Progress Alliance
ToDebating the Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601
MessageWe feel that this proposal was not created with the intention of finally resolving the Cabinet crisis in Aloria. We arrived at this conclusion due to the fact that the Monarchist Party was included in the list. Despite the fact that it is a very old party, it has not been able to effectively establish its presence to the Alorian people, as evidenced by their election record and the description of their stances on certain issues. Thus, we believe that the Monarchist Party should be excluded until it can show that it truly is capable of handling a government position.

Date17:13:39, July 04, 2008 CET
From Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
ToDebating the Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601
MessageOh c'mon. The MP got ONE seat, which is fitting considering their status in parliament and their lack of bill introduction over the past 5-6 election cycles. GP, you forget that point it seems. Plus, you received excellent seats. Stop stifling progress. Our cabinet is grossly out of date. Propose an even-handed cabinet if you think this one is no good and stop wasting time.

Date17:46:32, July 04, 2008 CET
FromGenuine Progress Alliance
ToDebating the Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601
MessageNo, they didn't. The last time they've acquired a seat, it was in 2195. Actually, we'd like to see the MP in the Cabinet, considering some of their legislative contributions. But the fact that they don't have a seat makes us wonder if they can take on the task.

For the sake of unity in Aloria, we'll change our vote to YES. But we do hope that the other parties do vote on this bill. That's basically the problem of this bill; it included all of the parties in Aloria. This makes it hard for it to pass, since we need all of them to vote. (OOC: Honestly, I don't expect all of them to vote.)

We'll also heed your advice and create our own cabinet proposal. Hopefully, we can finally have a Cabinet in Aloria.

Date17:48:53, July 04, 2008 CET
FromGenuine Progress Alliance
ToDebating the Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601
MessageWe also apologize to the Monarchist Party for our words. We know it was wrong of us to be a bit too judgmental. For that, we apologize/

Date20:45:18, July 04, 2008 CET
FromGenuine Progress Alliance
ToDebating the Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601
MessageLibertarian Party,

If you did not wish to work with "communists", which I assume you are referring to GPA, SA, and other non-libertarian parties, then why did you vote YES to this proposal by the MLP but said NO to our proposal? The "communists" are still here in the proposal. And their placement is basically the same as that of our proposal. SA still gets Prime Minister and Environment. GPA gets Defence (alone!). And the Liberal Party would still have Science and Justice.

In fact, we actually designed our proposal to give more priority to the ones in the majority, that being you and your libertarian colleagues. Our basis was simply the current Cabinet and this proposal by the MLP. Yet you rejected it because you would be working with "communists"? And yet you approved THIS proposal by the MLP even though you'll inevitably be working with "communists"?

Libertarian Party, we request for your answer.

- Genuine Progress Alliance

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 627

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 123


    Random fact: In your Message Centre there is a really useful feature which allows you to subscribe to all of the bill debates in your nation. If you use that, then the "Watched Discussions" section will show you every time a new message has been posted on a bill. You can also subscribe to other pages you want to follow, such as your nation message-board, party organisations or bills outside your nation which you are interested in.

    Random quote: "Liberalism is the transformation of mankind into cattle." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 76