We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 2601
Details
Submitted by[?]: Genuine Progress Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2602
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
New Socialist Alliance
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Liberal Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Conservative Union
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the New Socialist Alliance
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the 
Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Libertarian Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Genuine Progress Alliance
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Liberal Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Conservative Union
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Libertarian Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Libertarian Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:38:01, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2601 |
| Message | i won't be a part of government with communists. if this bill passes, all ministers, that LP is proposed to have, will resign. |
| Date | 20:36:33, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Genuine Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2601 |
| Message | What are you trying to say? That the GPA and SA and the Liberal Party and other non-CC parties are communists? Because the GPA was never and will never be a communist group. We believe in democracy, not communism. We believe in freedom, but not to the point where it has been overused as if it was an absolute thing. We believe in liberty with responsibility. Who, then, are you calling "communists"? The GPA? The SA? Tell us. And if you really do not wish to work with "communists", why did you vote YES to the Even-Handed Cabinet Proposal of June 2601 passed by the MLP, despite the fact that the SA and the GPA and other non-libertarian parties? Tell us. The words you are speaking right now do not match the actions that you had performed. |
| Date | 20:47:07, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Genuine Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2601 |
| Message | Another thing: Since you've voted NO, and since your mind might not change anyway, this proposal won't even get passed anyway even if the other parties included in the proposal voted YES. |
| Date | 23:18:48, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2601 |
| Message | LP, the executive cabinet is largely symbolic in case you didn't notice. Like the president. They can't make laws. That's parliament's job. It's token, you know? Your continued rhetoric of militancy is surprising. The commies haven't had control in nearly 2 decades. The libertarians are the people's choice. Just so you know. |
| Date | 15:10:50, July 05, 2008 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2601 |
| Message | SA are communists, even if liberal in civic liberties, they are for heavy regulation of everything else. i supported wide coalition when there was need for it, nowadays liberals (civic+market) have majority, so there is no need to include communists in the government. and even if gvt plays only symbolic role, i don't see why i should support one i don't agree with. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 430 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 175 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 145 |
| Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
| Random quote: "The true revolutionary is guided by great feelings of love. It is impossible to think of a genuine revolutionary lacking this quality." - Che Guevara |