We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: International Responsibility Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: freedom party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2118
Description[?]:
| We currently issue passports with no sort of background check whatsoever. We believe we owe it to other nations (whom our citizens might be entering for criminal reasons) and to our own nation (as our citizens might be fleeing for criminal reasons) A basic and non invasive check is sensible for security in our opinion. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Travel by nationals to foreign nations
Old value:: The nation issues passports on demand for any reason to its nationals
Current: The nation issues passports on demand for any reason to its nationals
Proposed: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:58:09, September 26, 2005 CET | From |  New Frontier Party | To | Debating the International Responsibility Act |
| Message | We lean towards opposing And would like to hear more |
| Date | 08:38:22, September 26, 2005 CET | From | freedom party | To | Debating the International Responsibility Act |
| Message | well, as you well know, we are a limited government party, but we do believe the govt has certain responsibilities. to itself and its neighbors. what if someone from our nation wished to perform a 9-11 type situation in another nation? a non invasive check is fair to us...... |
| Date | 22:54:16, September 26, 2005 CET | From | New Frontier Party | To | Debating the International Responsibility Act |
| Message | I have a problem with placing that much presumption on our nationals. we are more then willing to aggressively monitor such activities but i feel this is to broad unless done within a larger multinational conversation |
| Date | 06:45:20, September 27, 2005 CET | From | freedom party | To | Debating the International Responsibility Act |
| Message | we dont want to water down the bill, however are their any limitations or provisions you want placed here in? |
| Date | 21:36:09, September 29, 2005 CET | From | freedom party | To | Debating the International Responsibility Act |
| Message | hearing no ideas, we will bring to a vote. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 249 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 124 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 62 |
| Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
| Random quote: "The 20th century has been characterised by three developments of great political importance: the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power; and the growth of corporate propaganda against democracy." - Alex Carey |