We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitution Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Progressive Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2117
Description[?]:
| This bill is aimed at starting our nation on the road to democracy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Only the largest party can propose a cabinet.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 100
Current: 75
Proposed: 650
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:02:08, September 26, 2005 CET | From |  United Centrists | To | Debating the Constitution Reform Act |
| Message | The United Centrists favor both Articles. With increased political activity, more assembly seats and increased party powers would be quite beneficial. |
| Date | 06:18:47, September 26, 2005 CET | From | Solentian Corporate Communist Party | To | Debating the Constitution Reform Act |
| Message | We can accept this proposal. |
| Date | 07:43:21, September 26, 2005 CET | From | Revised Confederate Party | To | Debating the Constitution Reform Act |
| Message | Our party can agree as well. Hopefully the increased activity will continue. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 76 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 24 |
| Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification. |
| Random quote: "Soldiers who are not afraid of guns, bombs, capture, torture or death say they are afraid of homosexuals. Clearly we should not be used as soldiers; we should be used as weapons." - Letter to the editor, the Advocate |