Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 02:39:38
Server time: 01:20:21, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): ADM Drax | Harvey Dent | Kubrick2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: request from Egelion

Details

Submitted by[?]: Lodamun Libertarian Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2607

Description[?]:

Egelon has been attacked, and the HoS has requested we invoke NATOs article 4, and come to there aid. As promised I will but this up for a vote, and now its up to this parliament to decide our response to this request.

Since this would be a decleration of war it will need support from 2/3 of the parliament in additon to the president, prime minster, and minister of defence to pass.

Signed
President James Mattson

OOC: Here is the decleration of war against them http://www.takeforum.com/particracy/viewtopic.php?t=10228&mforum=particracy

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:05:25, July 17, 2008 CET
FromRepublican Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the request from Egelion
MessageI think the NATO treaty is quite simple, we are to help our comrades. I do not think a neutrality treaty is good enough, if we help them, they just simply can't back out if we need help.

Date16:22:18, July 17, 2008 CET
FromRepublican Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the request from Egelion
MessageIf We are not going to be using the NATO treaty, we can just withdraw from it. There's no need for a NATO treaty if they don't give us help or if we don't help them.

Date16:37:46, July 17, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Republican Party
ToDebating the request from Egelion
MessageThe Only reason I vote no is becuase its been said that Egelion didn't offer help when we needed it.
I feel you Treat as you are Treated.

Date18:51:25, July 17, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the request from Egelion
MessageWe agree with LRP. PP, where do you get the idea that they can't back out?

Date18:52:53, July 17, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the request from Egelion
MessageBefore we even go further, we would like to know what are the opinions of the Head of State, Head of Government, and Minister of Defense. There would be no point in voting here if one on them disagrees.

Date18:58:36, July 17, 2008 CET
FromRepublican Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the request from Egelion
MessageWell, LP, We feel we can just withdraw from the treaty if this do not pass. There is no point of having a NATO treaty if nobody follows it.

Date21:33:54, July 17, 2008 CET
FromWorking Families Party
ToDebating the request from Egelion
MessageMinister of Justice Gaines has said that it would be a violation of international law to remain a signatory of the NATO treaty yet refuse to comply. We must either abide by it, or abrogate it.

Date21:41:10, July 17, 2008 CET
FromWorking Families Party
ToDebating the request from Egelion
MessageOur party leader has just been notified that the Axis has taken the side of Egelion in its war with the KCCP. We cannot fight alongside members of the Axis. As such, we cannot vote for this war at this time. If other parties so wish, we are willing to work towards an alliance independent of both Communist and Axis forces -- and alliance which respects the basic rights of man and holds as its ideals Democracy and Liberty.

Date21:51:21, July 17, 2008 CET
FromRepublican Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the request from Egelion
MessageGood luck

Prime Minister, Sean Martinson.

Date00:04:03, July 18, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the request from Egelion
MessageI am afraid the Minister of Justice is flat out wrong. Maybe another good read of the article will help.

ARTICLE 4: NATO is a defensive alliance which adheres to the principles of collective security. Therefore any hostile act performed upon a member shall be taken as having been performed upon all signatories. To this end, should any hostile act occur upon a member, all members shall assist the signatory or signatories so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other members, such action as members deem necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security, sovereignty and integrity of all member states. This article shall be taken to have been automatically invoked when any said hostile act occurs.

"such action as members deem necessary"

That clearly means that we have the choice of helping or not. Basically doing whatever we think is necessary.

Kate Williams

Date00:16:10, July 18, 2008 CET
FromRepublican Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the request from Egelion
MessageThat is why I would support helping these people. It is the right thing to do, I will call for an immediate withdrawal from the NATO treaty if we are not going to respond.

Prime Minister Sean Martinson.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 25

no
    

Total Seats: 74

abstain
   

Total Seats: 51


Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting.

Random quote: "Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is." - Mahatma Gandhi

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62