We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2116
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Christian Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2117
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
Conservative Christian Union
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Conservative Christian Union
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Liberal Centrists
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Liberal Centrists
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Cildanian Nationalist Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Conservative Christian Union
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Union for a Responsible Republic
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Union for a Responsible Republic
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Union for a Responsible Republic
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Liberal Centrists
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:45:17, September 27, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Christian Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2116 |
| Message | Why are you guys opposed to the second largest party heading the cabinet? Clearly that should be the case if our HoS is the largest. |
| Date | 06:01:29, September 28, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Libertarian Cildanians | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2116 |
| Message | Because it doesn't benefit me :) And I assume TBD and the Independent Progressives feel the same way. |
| Date | 07:05:33, September 28, 2005 CET | From | Union for a Responsible Republic | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2116 |
| Message | I'm not going to support this. I get three Cabinet posts but they aren't very worthwhile. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 114 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 137 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 100 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "The opportunity to serve our country, that is all we ask." - John Smith |