Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 02:53:48
Server time: 13:06:11, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): JWDL | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Return of Freedom Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Civic Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2118

Description[?]:

Whereas while I was not here the CP passed a bill that I very much disagree with;
Whereas vital areas of our fundamental laws have been changed;
Whereas that bill was an outrage to Rutanian society;
It is resolved that the following be put in place:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:15:15, September 28, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageNever!!!! Especially the fifth article is a grave violation of human rights and the rights of the child!

Date15:17:32, September 28, 2005 CET
FromCivic Democratic Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageOkay I got rid of five but the others will stay.

Date16:44:35, September 28, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageWhat was five?

Date16:54:39, September 28, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageAllowing teachers to randomnly beat the crap out of their pupils with a baseball stick. ;-)

Date16:58:34, September 28, 2005 CET
FromCivic Democratic Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageDiscipline is set by schools.

Date20:07:25, September 28, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Imperialist Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageAye!

Date20:51:52, September 28, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageI would of supported five

Date21:18:16, September 28, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageWhat the hell is wrong with charter schools?

Date22:52:24, September 28, 2005 CET
FromCivic Democratic Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
Message"What the hell is wrong with charter schools?"

They're funded by the government and thus they recieve money from the government whereas the normal school in Rutania is funded only through private means. Thus this gives charter schools an uneven advantage over the schools currently in Rutania.

OOC: Lakhim for trying to play a Conservative you often do a bad job. ;-) Take this from a man who used to be a flaming far-right conservative.

Date23:33:29, September 28, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageOOC: I live in the US, and our right wing parties generally support charter schools (besides the wingnuts). Though we do have public schooling. Oh well. Doesn't really matter because we use vouchers, which subsidize schooling anyway...


However, I support charter schools for personal, not political reasons (ic)

Date23:33:35, September 28, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageOOC: I live in the US, and our right wing parties generally support charter schools (besides the wingnuts). Though we do have public schooling. Oh well. Doesn't really matter because we use vouchers, which subsidize schooling anyway...


However, I support charter schools for personal, not political reasons (ic)

Date23:33:37, September 28, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageOOC: I live in the US, and our right wing parties generally support charter schools (besides the wingnuts). Though we do have public schooling. Oh well. Doesn't really matter because we use vouchers, which subsidize schooling anyway...


However, I support charter schools for personal, not political reasons (ic)

Date23:33:58, September 28, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageWoah...

Date00:16:04, September 29, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
Messagelol

Date01:43:35, September 29, 2005 CET
FromCivic Democratic Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageTRIPLE POST!!!!!!1111 :P

Date02:00:53, September 29, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the The Return of Freedom Act
MessageIt gave me an error message, then decided it liked the post so much it had to post it three times :D

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 242

no
  

Total Seats: 296

abstain
   

Total Seats: 61


Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position.

Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 92