Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 03:04:40
Server time: 20:55:19, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | hexaus18 | hexaus19 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Abortion Rights Act of 2610

Details

Submitted by[?]: Green Party of Aldegar

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2612

Description[?]:

In accordance to upholding rights of the women, the bill will legalise abortion completely.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:24:12, July 24, 2008 CET
FromConservative Liberalism Party
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageI say yes. Says right on the party description: "Socially liberal."

Date06:44:07, July 24, 2008 CET
FromSocialist Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageWe strongly give our support to this bill.

Date09:11:19, July 24, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageThank you for your support. I hope to hear more from the other parties.

Date09:43:18, July 24, 2008 CET
FromFederation Aldegarian Party
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageIf pregnant women are allowed to abort at any time they wish, that would lead to deterioration in social feminine care; many of these people can turn sterile after many voluntary abortions, and they may not have any idea how this can damage their health and womanhood. Besides, allowing abortion COMPLETELY isn't granting women rights; it's just slipping off the attention required in more long-termed potential thinking such as population control, contraception and safe sex. Now, while we respect the rights to choose abortion, we would recommend pregnant women choose it within a certain time gap post-pregnancy which both allows time for wise, concurred decisions and proves minimal medical complications during operations; after this time gap, it is compulsory that abortion shall not be an option. This can save many women's lives and other rights as well.

Date09:52:11, July 24, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Unity Party
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageWe say no. And this is the fact due, that we don't have the right to abort an unborned childrens life, unless in an emergency case.

Date09:58:18, July 24, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageThe very idea of of human rights endowment is recognising the basic human ability that is to be responsible for their own bodies. We will supplement this bill with educational and informational support to warn women, and men, of the possible complications in late-term abortions. But if some still choose to have abortion late into their pregnancies, the state shall not abuse its power and deprive them of their right to choose how to treat their own bodies.
In regards to contraception and safe sex, there is nothing a state can do to promote these but through comprehensive sex education; unless of course the state is a totalitarian state. But do we want Aldegar to go that way? The Progressive Left Party certainly do not.

Date10:01:09, July 24, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageDUP, every person is endowed with the right to life. But is an unborned foetus a person? And we think it is better for a foetus not to be born rather than born to a pair (if it is even a pair) of unprepared parent(s).

Date20:27:27, July 24, 2008 CET
FromZoroastrian People's Party
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
Message
Our religious doctrine says yes.

Date01:32:56, July 25, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageZPP, is tht yes for the bill or for the question of unborne foetus being a person?

Date03:43:41, July 25, 2008 CET
FromParty of the Terravore
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageA foetus is not a human, regarding to our description of a human being is one that can consume food orally and can pay for it. We support your bill with cordially with all our belly.

Date03:44:26, July 25, 2008 CET
FromParty of the Terravore
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageA foetus is not a human, regarding to our description of a human being is one that can consume food orally and can pay for it. We support your bill with cordially with all our belly.

Date06:56:29, July 25, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageWe will close the debate by June 2610

Date08:31:35, July 25, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageOops. We mean June 2611

Date03:07:52, July 26, 2008 CET
FromSocialist Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageI keep a perspective eye for the future that perhaps after the next election we will have a pro reproductive rights government.

Date04:20:06, July 26, 2008 CET
FromPantheism Capitalistic Party UCF
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessageWould this mean that a woman can have an abortion a day before the due date? May we ask what kind of government we are to not protect life simply because it cannot protect itself.

Dining 'n Entertainment Industry's Party your definition of life would mean that infancide would be perfectly acceptable. As would extermination of the poor and the disabled.

Progressive Left Party, why not an adoption if the parents are unprepared?

We ask all parties voting yes for this bill how they would justify an abortion during the third trimester when the Fetus is able to feel pain.


Date07:49:41, July 26, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Abortion Rights Act of 2610
MessagePCP, yes the woman can if she chooses to do so.
Of course the Diners' definition of everything depends on their view of the world as the consumers and the consumed, even tough their name as an "industry" implies that they are producers.
Adoption is always good. But with the current status of adoptions only for heterosexual couples, most of whom have enough kids already, the chances are low. Secondly, our society still has a stigma on relationships outside marriage and the childern born from them. An adopted child might be faced with that stigma by his adopters, but not from his real parents.

HOWEVER, the PLP stands for female rights and will do everything in a democratic framework to ensure that conditions of female Aldegarians are improved. We see that a little improvement is better than nothing. Therefore, we are proposing to lower our expectations and propose a bill to legalise abortion to the second trimester, or the first trimester after this bill is voted down. We would like to hear from all parties of which of the two choices we can all achieve a compromise on to give women what should have been given to them a long time ago.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 565

abstain
 

Total Seats: 185


Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

Random quote: "I think one should not go fast, because if you make mistakes you don't realize what you've done." - Manuela Carmena

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 92