We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reintroduction of Impeachmen Against the Head of Government (Part 1)
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2612
Description[?]:
The Liberal Party hereby introduces the following Articles of Impeachment against the Prime Minister and First Commander of the Armed Forces Jonas Dale: Article 1: Violation of the Law According to Article 1 of the State of the Union Act which states: The Head of Government will adress Parliament every two years to inform about the State of the Union. No such adress to Parliament has occurred in three years. According to the Impeachment Process, this articles of impeachment will be put up for a vote in order to allow debate on them. Only a majority of votes present is needed. If the total of votes casted in favor of moving the impeachment to debate reaches seventy-six, the motion will immediately enter into the debate phase. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 08:14:00, July 26, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Reintroduction of Impeachmen Against the Head of Government (Part 1) |
Message | It will be put up for vote after the elections. |
Date | 13:20:57, July 26, 2008 CET | From | Democrats | To | Debating the Reintroduction of Impeachmen Against the Head of Government (Part 1) |
Message | Could you add that no such address has ever occurred, rather than just in the last three years. |
Date | 20:53:42, July 26, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Reintroduction of Impeachmen Against the Head of Government (Part 1) |
Message | We are impeaching the current PM not anyone from the past. |
Date | 22:54:10, July 26, 2008 CET | From | Holy Eliyahu Confession | To | Debating the Reintroduction of Impeachmen Against the Head of Government (Part 1) |
Message | we repeat our stance that we support impeachment as no case has been made as to why such adress was never made, but that we doubt the evidence exists to a high enough level to ultimately remove the gentleman from office. we also vote yes in order to force all other parties to stand up and speak on this issue rather than abstaining. |
Date | 23:35:44, July 26, 2008 CET | From | Lodamun Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Reintroduction of Impeachmen Against the Head of Government (Part 1) |
Message | as promised we in the LLP will vote yes to bring this into a debate since the 2 other articles have been removed |
Date | 23:45:11, July 26, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Reintroduction of Impeachmen Against the Head of Government (Part 1) |
Message | Well, since more than half of the legislature has voted yes, the motion to move to debate is agreed to. Debate on the Article of Impeachment will begin February 2612. Both sides will be presented and debated on. OOC: Since the impeachment will be against the PM, LLP, could you start answering any questions or debating with your PM character more often? The Chief Justice (me) will be presiding the debate (will not interfere with the debate, just manage it). Of course, anyone is free to ask any questions but let's keep it very formal, please. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 130 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 20 |
Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
Random quote: "A society that has more justice is a society that needs less charity." - Ralph Nader |