Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 03:09:23
Server time: 04:50:36, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): shemi64 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Economic Reform Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Berosian Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2613

Description[?]:

To provide our nation with abetter, freer economy, and to let our citizens do as they wish.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:16:41, July 27, 2008 CET
FromRed Tory Party
ToDebating the The Economic Reform Act
MessageExcellent proposition!
We support 100%.

Date22:19:14, July 27, 2008 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the The Economic Reform Act
MessageNo regulation? No tax? This is insane...

There's only one worthwhile article in the whoe arrangement, freeing up the workers... but the rest of it is somewhere between just destructive, and actively evil.

Date02:55:25, July 28, 2008 CET
FromBerosian Party
ToDebating the The Economic Reform Act
MessageRegulation isn`t necessary. The free market always regulates itself. The government has no need to intervene, and they would in fact harm the process if they did.

With regards to taxation, taxes are rarely a good thing. Taking money from our citizens only to give it to others is just plain wrong. The only reason we need taxes is to supply the populace with things that it could not supply itself (roads, buildings, hospitals, and other essential things), and to provide with protection of their rights (military, police, etc.). As it currently stands, if we removed every tax other than income tax, we would still be in a decently sized surplus. We would also have little to no taxation on consumption, which would raise our GDP and boost our economy. With more taxes, our citizens have less money, our GDP goes down, and the government retains a monopoly on industries that it wants to ban private practices from.

Date09:29:44, July 28, 2008 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the The Economic Reform Act
MessageInnocente Immeressen released the following statement:

"You can always tell when someone has been protected by the safety net of regulation, because they say naive things - like "the free market always regulates itself". Anyone who has ever actually seen a truly free market knows the reality - market forces can't fix every problem, and can't even touch most of them. Health services can never be fixed by a free market, sustenance level food markets can never be fixed by free markets... and energy - to a lesser - extent, can never be fixed by free markets. Things that are needed, not only as essentials, but as CONTINUOUS essentials, are immune to market forces. You can't boycott them, there's no effective alternatives... and they respond to pressure in selfish and unpredictable ways.

The Berosians might be happy to see Likatonians gouged. The Berosians might be willing to tell the Likatonian people to go to hell, so that they an a few of their friends can get rich quick - but, we'll always stand by The People. And they have always responded to that in the past. And they always will."

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 277

no
    

Total Seats: 389

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections.

    Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 84