We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Discrimination Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Holy Eliyahu Confession
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2613
Description[?]:
| A bill to ensure that the Armed forces select members based on a criteria which is in line with accepted practice in other segments of Lodamuni Society. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Discrimination in the military on grounds of race/religion.
Old value:: The government does not interfere with the military over who can serve in it.
Current: Any adult citizen can serve in the military, discrimination for racial or religious reasons is prohibited.
Proposed: Any adult citizen can serve in the military, discrimination for racial or religious reasons is prohibited.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:45:24, July 28, 2008 CET | From | Democrats | To | Debating the Military Discrimination Act |
| Message | We back the status quo. Let the military decide. If they have a prejudice, its probably for a good reason. |
| Date | 21:57:26, July 28, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Military Discrimination Act |
| Message | Prejudice is never an excuse for anything. We are sure that our military acts in its own interest and hires the most qualified individuals, without discrimination whatsoever. |
| Date | 23:11:46, July 28, 2008 CET | From | Holy Eliyahu Confession | To | Debating the Military Discrimination Act |
| Message | The back it up with your vote. The hypocrisy is astounding. |
| Date | 02:07:29, July 29, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Military Discrimination Act |
| Message | Who's vote? |
| Date | 05:37:45, July 29, 2008 CET | From | Holy Eliyahu Confession | To | Debating the Military Discrimination Act |
| Message | you're party has voted against this measure while agreeing with the auspice of it on the grounds that the military does not discriminate. If this is true (and I absolutely hope it is), why wouldn't you vote for it? |
| Date | 20:11:51, July 29, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Military Discrimination Act |
| Message | It was clearly explained above that we are confident that our military does not discriminate. Meaning that there is no need for this proposal to be implemented. Just for informational purposes, we are the sponsors of the current law. |
| Date | 23:46:04, July 29, 2008 CET | From | Holy Eliyahu Confession | To | Debating the Military Discrimination Act |
| Message | if theres no need, then whats the harm? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 39 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 111 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Party organizations are eligible for deletion if they are over 50 in-game years old, do not have at least 1 active member or are historically significant and possess historically significant information. |
| Random quote: "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli |