We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 2614
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2615
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
Liberal Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Centre Coalition
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Liberated Nationalist Organization
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Liberal Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Centre Coalition
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Liberal Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Conservative Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Conservative Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Liberal Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the The Green Manalishi Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Conservative Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Liberal Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Plowshare Collective
Article 14
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 20
Current: 50
Proposed: 50
Article 15
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Current: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Article 16
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Article 17
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons on non-civilian areas.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Article 18
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:35:43, August 01, 2008 CET | From | Plowshare Collective | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 2614 |
| Message | what the hell? cabinet proposal/random WMD plug? no. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 112 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 458 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 80 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "In public policy, it matters less who has the best arguments and more who gets heard, and by whom." - Ralph Reed |