Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 01:34:26
Server time: 10:25:33, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AethanKal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Power to the people...

Details

Submitted by[?]: Likaton Coalition of the Willing

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2616

Description[?]:

...who were elected by the people!

We propose ensuring democratic accountability is restored, by removing trivial or non-state issues from Central government, leaving them free to deal with national issues.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:45:44, August 01, 2008 CET
FromSpenocratic Party
ToDebating the Power to the people...
MessageWe agreed with half of the articles, but 9 kinda tipped it towards no.

Date21:17:10, August 01, 2008 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Power to the people...
MessageSome excellent proposals... and some we'd really rather not touch. Oy.

We'll have to deliberate this and come back to it.

Date22:06:34, August 01, 2008 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Power to the people...
MessageSpenocrats: you're happy to change "The nation can only use Chemical or Biological weapons on non-civillan areas" to "The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.", allowing us to use chemical weapons on civilians, but you get all het up over allowing people to have multiple loving relationships?

Weird.

AMSuD: If there are just one or two that stick in your collective craws, we can negotiate support for an immediate repeal?

Date23:38:08, August 01, 2008 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Power to the people...
Message"Article 1 is about irrelevent to us. We don't care if mayoral powers are granted by the citizens, the councils, the Head of State, or the Easter Bunny. Just so long as someone is filling an office at a local level that is answerable to the central government, and that can demand accountability FROM the central government.

Article 2 is a bit of a problem - what it does is make the independent province of Meria disproportionately powerful. Which is GOOD - for Merians. But sucks for the universal policies of Likatonia.

Article 3 seems retrogressive to us. We'd sooner see such weapons disposed of completely - and this just seems to be removing even more accountability.

Article 4, similarly, seems to be encouraging a certain type of militancy... almost... a viciousness? Defense is one thing, this seems to be erring into the territory of deliberate harm.

Article 5 seems fair. We're honestly about sick of the false claims and ridiculous flashing-lights-and-loud-noises approach we see so much of in modern Likatonian advertising. Some control would be nice.

Article 6 is half-hearted... a bit of an improvement, but not removing the threat of compulsion.

Article 7 is one of the times we don't believe that government has a pressing need to be directly involved. We're indifferent.

Article 8 works for us. We'd happily vote for that.

Article 9 seems to set up a media discrepancy. A movie can be rated 'adult' but the actual LAW doesn't stop anyone buying it - only the established practises of the merchants. To set an actual LAW on computer games seems discriminatory.

Article 10 is a step in the right direction. Strategic crops being guaranteed = a good thing.

Article 11 is totally agreeable to us, under the right circumstances. If we can't collectivise farming,we should at least split the bigger franchises into units that any worker can apply for.

Article 12 is excellent. Polygamy or monogamy - neither has any place having laws made to prohibit. In our opinion, so long as both (all) individuals are legally consenting, we don't care if it's boys or girls, or how many of each.

So - overall a very mixed bag. The military ones are our main headache, and we can't guarantee overturning those, because most of the new parties in the Interloper Regime are pro-massacre."

Avar Akaad Avara Immeressen, direct response to the Golden Sun.

Date05:20:37, August 02, 2008 CET
FromRed Tory Party
ToDebating the Power to the people...
MessageWhat a wonderful assortment of completely unrelated bills. But, we shall have to vote against, for we, are a party of reason.

Date14:09:58, August 02, 2008 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Power to the people...
MessageRevised

Date20:23:30, August 02, 2008 CET
FromRed Tory Party
ToDebating the Power to the people...
MessageSo many problems with this proposal... So much easier to just say no :)

Date23:23:02, August 02, 2008 CET
FromTraditional Conservative Party
ToDebating the Power to the people...
MessageWe agree with most of the articles in this bill, and strongly agree with the local sentiment given in it, however, there are certian ones that we strongly disagree with that force us to vote no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 42

no
    

Total Seats: 261

abstain
   

Total Seats: 363


Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules.

Random quote: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 134