We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Social Conservativism Bill Part I
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2616
Description[?]:
| Policies which our party faithful and called upon th leadership to put forward in order to save Lodamun from moral degeneration. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Current: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Homosexual relations are illegal, but are not prosecuted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:45:17, August 02, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Social Conservativism Bill Part I |
| Message | OOC: You are putting me in a tough situation here. I believe marriag is beween a man and a woman but I don't want to make homosexual relations being illegal. |
| Date | 23:37:19, August 02, 2008 CET | From | Republican Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Social Conservativism Bill Part I |
| Message | Are you guys kidding me, for illegalization of Homsexuality!? |
| Date | 05:22:21, August 03, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Social Conservativism Bill Part I |
| Message | If it is not prosecuted, there is no damage. This is simply the position the government takes on it. |
| Date | 05:22:22, August 03, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Social Conservativism Bill Part I |
| Message | If it is not prosecuted, there is no damage. This is simply the position the government takes on it. |
| Date | 14:16:56, August 03, 2008 CET | From | Republican Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Social Conservativism Bill Part I |
| Message | It's an offence to the liberties of the people, that they should not be afraid of being homosexual if they are. It's not something you chose, it's something you are from the beginning. And what will the kids understand it as, if the government says it is illegal? I promise you, there will be damage. |
| Date | 19:20:00, August 03, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Social Conservativism Bill Part I |
| Message | No physical damage is going to happen. They shouldn't be afraid, it is simply illegal without prosecution. It is something like this: If we tell you not to eat a piece of candy because it is illegal but nothing it going to happen to you if you do, would you eat it? |
| Date | 19:37:38, August 03, 2008 CET | From | Republican Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Social Conservativism Bill Part I |
| Message | The Liberal Party obviously have never been in real world. Telling our small kids that being homosexual is illegall vill advocate violence and discrimination towards homosexuals. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 114 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 36 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost. |
| Random quote: "Conservatism, however, is too often a welcome excuse for lazy minds, loath to adapt themselves to fast changing conditions." - Sigmund Freud |