We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Security Bill I (TSNP)

Details

Submitted by^[?]: al-Hizb at-Tukarali al-Qawmi al-Ijtima'i

Status^[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2619

Description^[?]:

As follows:

Proposal^[?] to change Nation's policy with regards to an intelligence agency.

Old value:: The nation has an intelligence agency, but it is limited to counter-intelligence and surveillance of other countries.

Current: The nation has an intelligence agency, but it is limited to counter-intelligence and surveillance of other countries.

Proposed: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.

Proposal^[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.

Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.

Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.

Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is not inviolable.

Proposal^[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.

Old value:: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.

Current: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.

Proposed: Police officers carry military-grade equipment.

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	01:15:58, August 08, 2008 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the National Security Bill I (TSNP)
Message	Each and every article in the bill is quite offensive. It is not hard to decide which way to vote.

Date	01:57:07, August 08, 2008 CET
From	al-Hizb at-Tukarali al-Qawmi al-Ijtima'i
To	Debating the National Security Bill I (TSNP)
Message	That's why soft people like you and the members of your party have no business representing the strong-willed people of Tukarali.

Date	01:58:47, August 08, 2008 CET
From	Judicial Union Party
To	Debating the National Security Bill I (TSNP)
Message	Yes, that would be why we're the largest party in the country, right? No, the people believe in our ways. The people believe in peace and freedom. No citizen should ever be afraid of their government, for it is a government of the people for the people.

Date	02:00:15, August 08, 2008 CET
From	Liberty Party
To	Debating the National Security Bill I (TSNP)
Message	We object to 3,5, and 6.

Date	20:01:16, August 08, 2008 CET
From	al-Hizb at-Tukarali al-Qawmi al-Ijtima'i
To	Debating the National Security Bill I (TSNP)
Message	No citizen should be afraid of the government because the government represents the citizens and the only people who have reason to fear a strong government are those who intend to usurp its authority, an authority given to it by the citizens. Yes, your party may be the largest in the country, but not for long. The people have seen where you have gotten us. Change is coming.

Date	20:02:02, August 08, 2008 CET
From	al-Hizb at-Tukarali al-Qawmi al-Ijtima'i
To	Debating the National Security Bill I (TSNP)
Message	I have removed 3, 5, 6 for debate in a further bill

Date	23:20:31, August 08, 2008 CET
From	Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
To	Debating the National Security Bill I (TSNP)
Message	good for you

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 0

Total Seats: 293

abstain

Total Seats: 207

Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time.

Random quote: "Politics is perhaps the only profession for which no preparation is thought necessary." - Robert Louis Stevenson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73