Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 00:49:24
Server time: 15:10:35, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): LC73DunMHP | Liu Che | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nonaligned Embassy Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Holy Eliyahu Confession

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2622

Description[?]:

a bill to promote Lodamuns impartial foreign policy and increase Lodamuns role as a intermediary on the international level by allowing all nations to have an embassy in Lodamun, irregardless of circumstance.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:02:09, August 15, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Nonaligned Embassy Act
MessageWe do not have relationships with some countries such as Likatonia and Deltaria. Both of them tried to invade us and take over our country. We certainly do not want their embassies in our soil. We are beginning to think that the LCDP want our country to be invaded by a foreign force.

Date07:43:42, August 15, 2008 CET
FromHoly Eliyahu Confession
ToDebating the Nonaligned Embassy Act
Messagewere amused by the Liberals statement. apparently being willing to talk to people is suddenly a invitation to invasion. quite the opposite, the current lack of dialogue with these states makes us less secure, and we intend to change that.

Date08:04:10, August 15, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Nonaligned Embassy Act
MessageEven if this law passes, we will still not allow a Likatonian or Deltarian embassy. Please check the "List of Foreign Affairs Actions" bill. It compiles our trade embargos and such.

Date08:06:35, August 15, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Nonaligned Embassy Act
MessageOOC: This bill is on the debate page but I will provide a link. The actual bills authorizing both actions should be somewhere. Feel free to look for them.

http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=187757

Date15:44:46, August 15, 2008 CET
FromHoly Eliyahu Confession
ToDebating the Nonaligned Embassy Act
Messageclearly this law would invalidate those old laws.

Date16:06:53, August 15, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Nonaligned Embassy Act
MessageOh, no. Those law clearly stated specific cases. Unless changed, those embassies will not be in our soil. We hope the LCDP respects history and respects our nation. We do not want the countries responsible for killing millions of our citizens to have embassies in our soil.

Date16:43:53, August 15, 2008 CET
FromHoly Eliyahu Confession
ToDebating the Nonaligned Embassy Act
Messagethe entire spirit of this law is that we are willing to put our rivalries aside and let them set up an avenue for dialogue. no harm ever came from having the civility to speak to someone.

if this bill passes, those old resolutions are clearly invalid.

Date17:06:40, August 15, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Nonaligned Embassy Act
MessageNo, they are not invalid. Those resolutions are for specific cases, no matter what the laws are. So, you have to authorize them individually.

You are a disgrace to this country. We will not give in, we will not be looked as being weak. We will not allow either one to set up an embassy in our country. They will probably say no anyways because they don't allow our embassy in their country either and they have the same bans on us.

Date18:42:05, August 15, 2008 CET
FromHoly Eliyahu Confession
ToDebating the Nonaligned Embassy Act
Messageim not saying that they will open an embassy, im simply saying there's no reason why we shouldn't let them.

by removing the authority of the foreign office to regulate who can open an embassy, any nation will in effect be allowed to open an embassy, and all previous agreements which go against the specific wording of this law would become automatically invalid. if the Liberals disagree and this bill passes then we invite them to take up their arguement with the Supreme Court. as for in this Parliament, we see no point continuing to argue this point.

Date18:47:30, August 15, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Nonaligned Embassy Act
MessageThe bans were passed by Parliament. We imposed trade embargos and closed down their embassies. No matter what the laws are, those embassies won't be reopened unless Parliament approves so in an INDIVIDUAL case by case basis. If you have a problem with that, take it up with the Supreme Court.

There is one simple reason, they murder millions of our citizens and they invaded us. Isn't that a good enough reason? Please, stop with your blind "internationalism" and come back to the real world.

Date19:09:44, August 15, 2008 CET
FromHoly Eliyahu Confession
ToDebating the Nonaligned Embassy Act
Messageand this law deals with all previous laws by saying that Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil. once this bill passes, we can argue over who's right. until then its a matter of no concern to the Christian Democrats, who have faith in the validity of their interpretation.

Blind hate is the only reason this parliament agreed to suspend diplomatic relations with these countries in the first place. We cannot change the past, but we are fools if we let past tragedies dictate future blunders.

Date19:37:36, August 15, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Nonaligned Embassy Act
MessageThey were not tragedies, they were attacks. Our predecesors would be very sad to see our country fall so low after the massacres that occured in our country.

We did not act in blind hate, we acted on the facts. Please check the history books.

Any other country does not mean all countries.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 115

no
  

Total Seats: 35

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to prevent confusion by ensuring unofficial or outdated bills labelled as "Cultural Protocols" are removed from their nation page.

    Random quote: "I have no faith in political arithmetic." - Adam Smith

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 58