Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5475
Next month in: 02:29:14
Server time: 13:30:45, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): JourneyJak | Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Unity Cabinet

Details

Submitted by[?]: Zoroastrian People's Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2625

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:47:49, August 21, 2008 CET
FromSocialist Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet
MessageThis is an unfair cabinet. As evident the ZPP is trying to bribe another party to stay in power even when they willingly would never share the power. I urge all parties in the House of Commons to vote against this coalition.

Date08:57:29, August 22, 2008 CET
FromZoroastrian People's Party
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet
MessageI've proposed sharing power in the past. And voted for cabinets sharing power. I vastly preferred the Meritocrat Libertarian Party's cabinet proposal last time around but unfortunately it didn't have the votes to pass.

As for whether any part is being bribed. Obviously parties should vote for the proposal they think gives their party what they desire. We tried not to be greedy and share the more high profile positions with others. Hopefully those parties in this proposal will appreciate that and find it to their liking.

Date15:09:56, August 22, 2008 CET
FromConservative Liberalism Party
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet
MessageWhere am I? My place in the government will be on the opposition, voting no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 156

no
    

Total Seats: 476

abstain
 

Total Seats: 118


Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play".

Random quote: "In politics, you have your word and your friends; go back on either and you're dead." - Morton C. Blackwell

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64