Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 01:51:19
Server time: 18:08:40, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | Paulo Nogueira | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Realignment Act Section I

Details

Submitted by[?]: Holy Eliyahu Confession

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2629

Description[?]:

The Ligowy Chrzescijanski od Lodska propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the United Republics of Lodamun.

This bill will introduce privatization of the health and education sectors of Lodamun, and use the decreased social spending to cut the abysmally high taxes of our nation and also provide for increased defense funding in response to Likatonia.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:05:37, August 30, 2008 CET
FromReformed Conservative Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
MessageI am always in favor of reduced government spending. Greater defense funds, however, we believe to be a prudent measure. Bravo!

Date00:06:26, August 30, 2008 CET
FromFree Peoples Party
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
MessageMy party poses the question, why do you need to cut $50.5 billion from the budget to put an extra $10 billion into our defence forces?

You could just cut $10 billion and that way you don't end up with a huge army but no healthcare, schools, technology and an extra $40.5 billion doing nothing!

Date00:08:19, August 30, 2008 CET
FromHoly Eliyahu Confession
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
Messagebecause the we mean to give the other 40 billion in a tax cut to the people, and also because that extra money will be unnecessary once these new laws are in place.

Date00:10:32, August 30, 2008 CET
FromFree Peoples Party
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
Messageok, i didn't read the acrticles, i just jumped to the budget bit

sorry

we strongly support

Date00:12:50, August 30, 2008 CET
FromReformed Conservative Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
MessageIt is time for the people of Lodamun to stand up for themselves and stop being children of the government. Let them work just a little for the things they need and they will learn to value them!

Also, in regards to military spending, it was not long ago that our nation was threatened with attack, and with our economic and social growth, it is certainly possible that we may face further military engagements.

Date00:44:08, August 30, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
MessageThis is the most horrendous bill in decades. Not only does it leav our people unprotected, it actually takes funding away from the some of the most important parts of our budget. Tota disaster! We strongly oppose.

Date00:58:58, August 30, 2008 CET
FromHoly Eliyahu Confession
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
Messagethe average person will not feel any pain in this bill at all, in fact the quality of care in our health and education sectors will probably be better as we will have less people to provide for once we factor in those who chose privatized industries.

Date03:16:47, August 30, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
MessageNever assume anything! That's the rule of politics and economics. You cannot assume your bills will pass. Since they have not passed, your statement is, as of now, false.

Date03:34:08, August 30, 2008 CET
FromHoly Eliyahu Confession
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
MessageThe budget is tied to the proposals we have listed here. What are the Liberals so confused about?

Date03:40:53, August 30, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
MessageExactly the point. Your bills have NOT passed in order to reduce the funding on tho budgets.

Date04:02:40, August 30, 2008 CET
FromHoly Eliyahu Confession
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
Messageooc: what about the fact that the budget and the proposals being tied together is so confusing?

Date06:04:28, August 30, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
MessageOOC: Who said anything about confusion?

Date10:17:49, August 30, 2008 CET
FromChristian Reformist Party
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
MessageI support big defense funds but I oppose low tax and low budget for Health education and Science.

Date19:19:42, August 30, 2008 CET
FromCollectivist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the National Realignment Act Section I
MessageActually I kind of like the idea of always updating the budget with new acts.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 55

no
     

Total Seats: 95

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640

Random quote: "We are told that this is an odious and unpopular tax. I never knew a tax that was not odious and unpopular with the people who paid it." - John Sherman

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 108