We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Safety Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: We Say So! Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2631
Description[?]:
The ownership of all Private firearms within the Empire will, henceforth and with immediate effect, be banned in order to safeguard the security of all members of the public, and to reduce the availability of firearms to criminal elements. The Armed Forces and Police are exempt from the above laws, however members of the aforementioned services are not allowed to bring said firearms to their place of residence within the borders of the Empire. All such firearms required for the operation of those services will be kept under tight security within the confines of aforementioned barracks or stations and may only be removed when required for either training or for direct use for the means in which they are designed and returned forthwith at the end of any operation. Privately operated security firms are covered by this law as those firearms are deemed to be owned on a Private and/or individual basis and as such are not entitled to handle firearms. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Current: Individuals are allowed to own firearms as long as they do not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality.
Proposed: Individuals are not permitted to own firearms under any circumstances.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:37:51, September 01, 2008 CET | From | Hobrazian Extraordinary Gentlemen's Club | To | Debating the Public Safety Act |
Message | A spokesperson from HSJP comment on this bill earlier: "Even though, the arguments the We Say So! Party used in addition to the main proposal of the bill are very clear and contain a seed of truth in them, our party will not be supporting the bill. Despite the fact that it might sound like an oxymoron, but acceptance of this bill not permitting to own firearms under any circumstances to individuals in our country, will indicate a step towards a military state. " |
Date | 09:10:26, September 02, 2008 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Public Safety Act |
Message | It sounds like an oxymoron because it is. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 115 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 87 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 198 |
Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "The use of solar energy has not been opened up because the oil industry does not own the sun." - Ralph Nader |