We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Social Reform Bill 1: Environmental/Energy Strengthening/Reformation and Environmentally Related Warfare Regulations Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kristen Socialdemokratisk Partiet
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2636
Description[?]:
This is the first bill in the Social Reform Bills series of acts. This bill is designed to focus in on helping our environment grow stronger. For example, we will, instead of using a ton of nuclear power, avoid the, even though it small, possibility of a meltdown. We will tap into more resources such as wind and solar power. In addition, we will require deforesters to replant trees at a higher rate than they cut them down, to make up for losses. We want to proivde people with these clean forms of energy, so we will further regulate the price companies can charge them, to provide efficient energy for everyone. Lastly, the government shall take care of disposing all waste so that we can do our best to dispose it in an environmentally friendly way. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private, unregulated companies but subsidies are given to those on a low income.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Proposed: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power.
Current: The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power.
Proposed: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Proposed: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government requires tree plantation at replacement level for all logging or clearance operations.
Current: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Proposed: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: Private companies are responsible for disposing of their own waste. The government disposes of residential waste.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Article 7
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on whaling.
Old value:: Commercial whaling is legal, but the government establishes whaling quotas.
Current: Whaling is illegal.
Proposed: Commercial whaling is illegal, but whaling for scientific purposes is allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:41:24, September 05, 2008 CET | From | Nasjonal Front | To | Debating the Social Reform Bill 1: Environmental/Energy Strengthening/Reformation and Environmentally Related Warfare Regulations Act |
Message | We would only support Article 1 on Energy Regulation. |
Date | 03:57:40, September 05, 2008 CET | From | Kristen Socialdemokratisk Partiet | To | Debating the Social Reform Bill 1: Environmental/Energy Strengthening/Reformation and Environmentally Related Warfare Regulations Act |
Message | Hmmm... okay. I'll keep that in mind. Please, everyone, voice your opinions so I can get a final agreement on what we should send to be voted on in the Storinget. |
Date | 11:34:43, September 06, 2008 CET | From | Mitten Partiet | To | Debating the Social Reform Bill 1: Environmental/Energy Strengthening/Reformation and Environmentally Related Warfare Regulations Act |
Message | We don't support Article 7 and 2 but all other we agree on |
Date | 16:55:40, September 06, 2008 CET | From | Liberal Conservatives | To | Debating the Social Reform Bill 1: Environmental/Energy Strengthening/Reformation and Environmentally Related Warfare Regulations Act |
Message | I strongly disagree with nationalization and will reject any proposals advocating such |
Date | 01:35:56, September 08, 2008 CET | From | Kristen Socialdemokratisk Partiet | To | Debating the Social Reform Bill 1: Environmental/Energy Strengthening/Reformation and Environmentally Related Warfare Regulations Act |
Message | So, who all believes that Article 2 on energy regulation should be removed? Who does not? |
Date | 01:42:57, September 08, 2008 CET | From | Kristen Socialdemokratisk Partiet | To | Debating the Social Reform Bill 1: Environmental/Energy Strengthening/Reformation and Environmentally Related Warfare Regulations Act |
Message | Here: These are all the choices, including the current law. For those of you who do not like the 1st choice on the list, how do you like the second proposal? Energy is provided by nationalised companies. Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated. Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations. Energy provision is left to local governments. Currently: Energy is provided by private, unregulated companies but subsidies are given to those on a low income. |
Date | 17:13:55, September 08, 2008 CET | From | Mitten Partiet | To | Debating the Social Reform Bill 1: Environmental/Energy Strengthening/Reformation and Environmentally Related Warfare Regulations Act |
Message | Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated I prefere |
Date | 01:22:27, September 09, 2008 CET | From | Kristen Socialdemokratisk Partiet | To | Debating the Social Reform Bill 1: Environmental/Energy Strengthening/Reformation and Environmentally Related Warfare Regulations Act |
Message | If no one likes the first option, then the second option is my choice. |
Date | 23:23:06, September 09, 2008 CET | From | Kristen Socialdemokratisk Partiet | To | Debating the Social Reform Bill 1: Environmental/Energy Strengthening/Reformation and Environmentally Related Warfare Regulations Act |
Message | The article on energy regulation has been changed to, instead of nationalising it, we just further regulate prices. For the current moment, the article on waste disposal will remain at, "the government is responsible for waste disposal." |
Date | 15:12:27, September 11, 2008 CET | From | Kristen Socialdemokratisk Partiet | To | Debating the Social Reform Bill 1: Environmental/Energy Strengthening/Reformation and Environmentally Related Warfare Regulations Act |
Message | We are now closing the debate phase. |
Date | 15:16:51, September 11, 2008 CET | From | Kristen Socialdemokratisk Partiet | To | Debating the Social Reform Bill 1: Environmental/Energy Strengthening/Reformation and Environmentally Related Warfare Regulations Act |
Message | Soon. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 107 | ||
no | Total Seats: 141 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 252 |
Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360 |
Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon |