We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Post Office Privatisation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Liberal Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2120
Description[?]:
We believe that the post office system should be privatised (OOC: i'm still not entirely certain as to whether there is a need to regulate prices however for the moment i have gone with it in order to ensure that the poorest are able to afford the cost of stamps etc. however i am prepared to change it - as one can argue that competition should keep prices low!!) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: There is a nationalised post office. Private post office agencies are allowed to exist, and the services provided by them are not regulated.
Current: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Proposed: Only private post agencies exist, and the services they provide are regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:37:51, October 01, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Post Office Privatisation Act |
Message | Seems fine. |
Date | 03:29:22, October 02, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Post Office Privatisation Act |
Message | no it doesent, are you all mad? |
Date | 06:16:45, October 02, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Post Office Privatisation Act |
Message | Yup. =) |
Date | 22:35:01, October 02, 2005 CET | From | Rationalist Party | To | Debating the Post Office Privatisation Act |
Message | What about isolated communities? They won't be profitable... |
Date | 04:37:36, October 03, 2005 CET | From | Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United | To | Debating the Post Office Privatisation Act |
Message | This will sound crazy coming from me, but this is actually one of the few things I believe shouldnt be privatized. |
Date | 10:09:47, October 03, 2005 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Post Office Privatisation Act |
Message | Don't tell me that we're going to have a Japan like situtation here!!! |
Date | 19:49:23, October 03, 2005 CET | From | Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United | To | Debating the Post Office Privatisation Act |
Message | ? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 83 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 172 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: "The Revolution needs to progress. We as humans need to evolve into higher beings through better moral virtues. And we can achieve that if we clean ourselves from the immoral. Those who go against the Revolution, go against human progress and must be freed in the most humane way possible. That is why we introduced the guillotine." - Maximus Robertson, former Davostani revolutionary |