We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Budget proposal of March 2640
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free Peoples Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2640
Description[?]:
The Minister of Finance proposes the new Federal budget, with the approval of the President. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
Head of Government | 500,000,000 LOD | 500,000,000 LOD | 500,000,000 LOD |
Foreign Affairs | 4,000,000,000 LOD | 4,500,000,000 LOD | 4,500,000,000 LOD |
Internal Affairs | 6,000,000,000 LOD | 4,500,000,000 LOD | 5,500,000,000 LOD |
Finance | 1,500,000,000 LOD | 750,000,000 LOD | 800,000,000 LOD |
Defence | 11,500,000,000 LOD | 40,000,000,000 LOD | 45,000,000,000 LOD |
Justice | 5,500,000,000 LOD | 2,750,000,000 LOD | 3,000,000,000 LOD |
Infrastructure and Transport | 7,500,000,000 LOD | 3,250,000,000 LOD | 4,250,000,000 LOD |
Health and Social Services | 20,000,000,000 LOD | 45,000,000,000 LOD | 45,000,000,000 LOD |
Education and Culture | 17,500,000,000 LOD | 45,000,000,000 LOD | 45,000,000,000 LOD |
Science and Technology | 2,000,000,000 LOD | 9,000,000,000 LOD | 10,000,000,000 LOD |
Food and Agriculture | 5,000,000,000 LOD | 3,000,000,000 LOD | 3,000,000,000 LOD |
Environment and Tourism | 500,000,000 LOD | 4,500,000,000 LOD | 4,500,000,000 LOD |
Trade and Industry | 5,500,000,000 LOD | 2,000,000,000 LOD | 2,500,000,000 LOD |
Total | 87,000,000,000 LOD | 164,750,000,000 LOD | 173,550,000,000 LOD |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:21:19, September 21, 2008 CET | From | Reformed Conservative Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Budget proposal of March 2640 |
Message | I see no need for any of the increased spending. We need to be cutting spending, not increasing it! |
Date | 20:12:26, September 21, 2008 CET | From | Holy Eliyahu Confession | To | Debating the Budget proposal of March 2640 |
Message | defense does not need an increase. we respect trying to use up the remainder of the surplus, but we would rather it be better spent. |
Date | 20:52:35, September 21, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of March 2640 |
Message | We withdraw ou support from this budget proposal. While we agree with it, we just received information that it will put us in deficit spending. We firmly disagreewith defecit spending and will never vote for a budget that put us there. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 60 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 85 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
Random quote: "A theory that seems to explain everything is just as good at explaining nothing"- Christopher Hitchens |