We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Re-Introduction of the FAP
Details
Submitted by[?]: Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2642
Description[?]:
| Bringing back the days of the old. Just a main recollection of our past standings. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Proposed: All abortions are illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Current: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Proposed: The police may disperse a group without giving any reason.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may not seize private property.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for any reason.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government agricultural and farming subsidies policy.
Old value:: The government subsidises agriculture based on market demand for the crop being grown.
Current: Strategic crops are produced on State owned farms. All other produce is left to the Private sector.
Proposed: Strategic crops are produced on State owned farms. All other produce is left to the Private sector.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Firefighting services.
Old value:: Fire prevention and management is left to the local governments.
Current: There is a national fire department, funded by the government.
Proposed: There is a national fire department, funded by the government.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: The military acts as a de-facto police force, with powers of arrest.
Article 7
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The decision is left up to local governments.
Current: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Proposed: The government requires most energy to be generated by nuclear power.
Article 8
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards space exploration.
Old value:: Space exploration and use shall be totally unregulated.
Current: The government shall fully fund a state-owned space agency which controls all national space-related activity.
Proposed: The government shall fully fund a state-owned space agency which controls all national space-related activity.
Article 9
Proposal[?] to change The government policy regarding housing.
Old value:: All housing is private but rent is subsidised for low-income households.
Current: The state provides public housing to low-income families.
Proposed: The state owns and maintains all housing.
Article 10
Proposal[?] to change Women's working rights.
Old value:: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Current: Women are entitled the same working rights as men.
Proposed: Women are not allowed to perform potentially dangerous tasks.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:58:11, September 22, 2008 CET | From |  Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | For a party that supports enviornmental measures, Sekkyoku, I'm surprised you'd vote against the proposal on nuclear power. Alternative energy, don't you want that for the people? Clean energy, pretty good for you. |
| Date | 23:41:17, September 22, 2008 CET | From | Republican Coalition | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | Opposed to 4, 5, 7 and 8 |
| Date | 00:44:26, September 23, 2008 CET | From | Königstreue Sozialdemokrat 社会民主 | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | We do not support nuclear power. We support the other, more safe and secure, alternatives. |
| Date | 00:51:26, September 23, 2008 CET | From | Republican Coalition | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | Nuclear power is, by and large, safe and secure. Unlike water and tidal power, which harm the environoment in huge ways |
| Date | 01:08:49, September 23, 2008 CET | From | Königstreue Sozialdemokrat 社会民主 | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | Hydropower does not harm the environment. Hydropower is also not possibly dangerous like nuclear power. A meltdown could contaminate a whole area for years and cause sickness for hundreds of people. In very hot weather, nuclear power plants sometimes even have to completely have to shut down because of the way they operate. Nuclear power is simply unsafe and should not be allowed. |
| Date | 01:13:34, September 23, 2008 CET | From | Traditional Conservative's Party | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | The "old days" of the FAP were a rule by the majority, who used their power to rule with an iron fist. We disagree with every article in this bill. |
| Date | 01:19:35, September 23, 2008 CET | From | Republican Coalition | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | Hydropower relies on flooding or otherwise damaging vast areas of water-side environment. There has been one nuclear meltdown in recorded history... |
| Date | 01:23:28, September 23, 2008 CET | From | Traditional Conservative's Party | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | Well, almost every article... |
| Date | 01:24:27, September 23, 2008 CET | From | Königstreue Sozialdemokrat 社会民主 | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | Hydropower first of all just if it relied on flooding would not mean it harms the environment; flooding is a natural thing. Secondly, hydropower uses the force of flowing water to create power, not floods. |
| Date | 01:27:10, September 23, 2008 CET | From | Republican Coalition | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | Flooding by dams is not natural And it requires vast reservoirs, flooding environmentally sound areas, to work |
| Date | 01:36:37, September 23, 2008 CET | From | Königstreue Sozialdemokrat 社会民主 | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | Creating a reservoir does not harm the environment. Yes it does "flood" some unused land, but other than that, it does nothing harmful. |
| Date | 02:00:48, September 23, 2008 CET | From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | I say we get our power from the sun damn you! Um, I mean yes Nuclear Power can lead the way for this great nation for alternative energy. Nuclear Energy will just have to be the stepping stone for future projects, this is what we have to work with, let's take advantage of it. |
| Date | 02:11:37, September 23, 2008 CET | From | Republican Coalition | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | That unused land is enviromentally sacremount, often preserving vast areas of swamp or marshland, a fertile habitat for many species otherwise driven extinct by the flooding of their homes. You seem to have no idea what the environment is, it includes small areas of land, not just such things as global temperatures and human wellfare. |
| Date | 23:37:01, September 23, 2008 CET | From | Wiedervereinigten Nationalisten | To | Debating the Re-Introduction of the FAP |
| Message | We oppose this bill, and although we strongly support nuclear energy, we feel that this proposal would adversely affect our nation's economy and we prefer to leave this matter to local governments, on the basis of local government empowerment. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 197 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 357 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 96 |
| Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset. |
| Random quote: "I realize that a life predicated on being obedient and taking orders is a very comfortable life indeed. Living in such a way reduces to a minimum one's need to think." - Adolf Eichmann |