We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protection of Personal Property
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mutual Freedom Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2649
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The policy regarding eminent domain is left to local governments.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works and for corporate use.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government policy regarding housing.
Old value:: Housing policy is to be determined by local governments.
Current: The state contracts with private companies to provide public housing.
Proposed: All housing is privately-owned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:46:57, October 08, 2008 CET | From |  Renewal Party | To | Debating the Protection of Personal Property |
| Message | While the Renewal Party sympathizes with this bill and advocates for no state involvement at the local level, we believe a pluralistic society allows communities to regulate themselves even when that allows a community to make incorrect decisions regarding government spending. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 164 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 586 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
| Random quote: "Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves." - Confucius |