We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Foreign Investments Act 2648
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lodamun National Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2649
Description[?]:
Outside companies / persons need government approval to invest in national companies. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign investments.
Old value:: Foreign investors may freely invest in national companies.
Current: Foreign investors may freely invest in national companies.
Proposed: Foreign investors need to obtain government approval for all investments in national companies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:10:07, October 08, 2008 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Foreign Investments Act 2648 |
Message | Yikes! No offense, but this is insane. Why are we limiting foreign invesment in our companies? Shouldn't we promote investment rather than make it nearly impossible? |
Date | 15:51:22, October 08, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Foreign Investments Act 2648 |
Message | It is NATIONAL companies. Don't the owners of a private company have to authorize investments in their company? The national government is an owner as well and it will do the same under this law. |
Date | 22:25:27, October 08, 2008 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Foreign Investments Act 2648 |
Message | National companies are merely companies in the nation - not nationalized industries. Read the options and I think it's clear what this bill means and it's not what you claim as usual. |
Date | 23:07:01, October 08, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Foreign Investments Act 2648 |
Message | It can be interpreted both ways. National could mean nationalized or those companies whose headquarters are in the country. We choose to interpret it one way, you choose to interpret it in another way. Deal with it. |
Date | 01:53:59, October 09, 2008 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Foreign Investments Act 2648 |
Message | Your interpretation is wrong as usual. Read the other options - they make no sense under your reading of the law. But we'll just have to deal woth liberal ignorance as usual |
Date | 04:26:46, October 09, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Foreign Investments Act 2648 |
Message | Well, the law is going to pass. So, we recommend you save your arguments for later. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 67 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 38 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 20 |
Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer. |
Random quote: Wait a min was we tricked into voting for absolute monarchy (Jamie Jamesson, Chancellor of Luthori 4269-4310) |