Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 01:27:59
Server time: 14:32:00, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): rezins | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Foreign Investments Act 2648

Details

Submitted by[?]: Lodamun National Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2649

Description[?]:

Outside companies / persons need government approval to invest in national companies.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:10:07, October 08, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investments Act 2648
MessageYikes! No offense, but this is insane. Why are we limiting foreign invesment in our companies? Shouldn't we promote investment rather than make it nearly impossible?

Date15:51:22, October 08, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investments Act 2648
MessageIt is NATIONAL companies. Don't the owners of a private company have to authorize investments in their company? The national government is an owner as well and it will do the same under this law.

Date22:25:27, October 08, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investments Act 2648
MessageNational companies are merely companies in the nation - not nationalized industries. Read the options and I think it's clear what this bill means and it's not what you claim as usual.

Date23:07:01, October 08, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investments Act 2648
MessageIt can be interpreted both ways. National could mean nationalized or those companies whose headquarters are in the country. We choose to interpret it one way, you choose to interpret it in another way. Deal with it.

Date01:53:59, October 09, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investments Act 2648
MessageYour interpretation is wrong as usual. Read the other options - they make no sense under your reading of the law. But we'll just have to deal woth liberal ignorance as usual

Date04:26:46, October 09, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investments Act 2648
MessageWell, the law is going to pass. So, we recommend you save your arguments for later.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 67

no
  

Total Seats: 38

abstain
  

Total Seats: 20


Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

Random quote: Wait a min was we tricked into voting for absolute monarchy (Jamie Jamesson, Chancellor of Luthori 4269-4310)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52