Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 03:21:41
Server time: 00:38:18, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): ImperialLodamun | JourneyJak | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Foreign Relations Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Raging Bull Zealots of Zidine

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2123

Description[?]:

To Keep our boarders safe.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:55:14, October 04, 2005 CET
FromSect of the Green Moon
ToDebating the Foreign Relations Act
MessageI agree.

Date04:08:03, October 04, 2005 CET
From Grand National Party
ToDebating the Foreign Relations Act
MessageAgreed.

Date22:17:57, October 04, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Foreign Relations Act
MessageThis goes against the citizens' freedom of liberty.

Date17:53:50, October 05, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Foreign Relations Act
MessageBorder control doesn't need such maximum security, and I think that minimal yet existent border control seems ideal, however I can fully understand researching citizens in order to call them citizens when they are issued a passport.

Date18:12:20, October 08, 2005 CET
FromSect of the Green Moon
ToDebating the Foreign Relations Act
MessageYeah, but WHAT ABOUT THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!!! What if they have a foriegn disease eh? What do you do then, and besides illeterate immigrants would cause an unnessary load on the public helth and education system.

Date08:28:32, October 09, 2005 CET
FromOld School Liberal Party
ToDebating the Foreign Relations Act
MessageWe are absolutely against this legislation. There is no reason that we should restrict the rights of people so severely.

Date22:53:10, October 09, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Foreign Relations Act
MessageEconomic Party, illegal immigrants have less of an impact than legal immigrants. You are proposing that we lock our borders and give each province a self-containted military.

Instead of pouring money into border security (to harm would-be citizens), we should put more money into the health care and social services (to benefit all of our real citizens). If anything, we should give the people ID cards to help with security, but not invasive security checks and exploiting poor nations for our own economic benefit.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 194

no
   

Total Seats: 106

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law.

Random quote: "Power always has to be kept in check; power exercised in secret, especially under the cloak of national security, is doubly dangerous." - William Proxmire

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 78