We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: DSP.306.2654
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2654
Description[?]:
| Justice system reform. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Current: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Proposed: There is a uniform system of courts across the nation.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government provision of legal aid to the accused.
Old value:: Legal representation for defendants in criminal trials is paid for by the state for defendants with low incomes.
Current: Legal representation for defendants in criminal trials is paid for by the state.
Proposed: Legal representation for defendants in criminal trials is paid for by the state.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Current: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons.
Proposed: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons apart from specially trained firearms units.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards police presence.
Old value:: The police do not actively patrol public property.
Current: Presence of the police is left to the local governments.
Proposed: The police patrol public property at all times.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:37:04, October 19, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the DSP.306.2654 |
| Message | You want a police state? That would be both very expensive AND repressive. |
| Date | 09:10:36, October 19, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the DSP.306.2654 |
| Message | A police state that can't handle a threat if it arises, it seems. No, this is just ridiculous. No to leaving our police helpless. They have lives worth saving, more than a criminals. No to an increased police presence. Our people deserve to live without fear of scrutinizing eyes. |
| Date | 15:58:16, October 19, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the DSP.306.2654 |
| Message | We'd support Proposed: There is a uniform system of courts across the nation. and Proposed: The police patrol public property at all times. by thesemselves. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 134 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 466 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who deliberately attempt to present a misleading picture of the nation's current RP laws will be subject to sanction. |
| Random quote: "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson |