We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Budget proposal of June 2120
Details
Submitted by[?]: Radical Greens
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2122
Description[?]:
The Progressive Greens propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Kundrati Union. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
Head of Government | 1,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 20,816,000,000 KUN |
Foreign Affairs | 50,000,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 60,816,000,000 KUN |
Internal Affairs | 70,000,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN |
Finance | 60,000,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN |
Defence | 90,000,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 10,816,000,000 KUN |
Justice | 100,000,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN |
Infrastructure and Transport | 200,000,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 60,816,000,000 KUN |
Health and Social Services | 500,000,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 60,816,000,000 KUN |
Education and Culture | 600,000,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 60,816,000,000 KUN |
Science and Technology | 50,000,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 60,816,000,000 KUN |
Food and Agriculture | 50,000,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 60,816,000,000 KUN |
Environment and Tourism | 10,000,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 60,816,000,000 KUN |
Trade and Industry | 500,000,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 60,816,000,000 KUN |
Total | 2,280,001,000,000 KUN | 0 KUN | 670,608,000,000 KUN |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:13:24, October 04, 2005 CET | From | Free Market Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of June 2120 |
Message | OOC: Was this bill created anew? All the messages are gone. Also, why is it that anybody can propose a budget? I thought only the Minister of Finance could do that. IC: As we have already said, this bill will reduce our defense spending by nearly 80%. This is an absurd budget cut. It will not just limit the growth of the military, it will destroy the military. Many of our current weapon systems are expensive to maintain. If this budget proposal passes, we will be forced to dispose of many of these systems. Our military will be starved to death by a lack of funding. We are not a member of any well-organized defense alliance. We must be able to defend ourselves. This bill destroys our ability to do so. In addition, we notice that this bill increases our total budget. We do not wish to see the budget increased, but if we are to increase spending then we certainly should not cut defense spending by 80%. This bill is simply irrisponsible, and we cannot support it. |
Date | 19:45:48, October 04, 2005 CET | From | Radical Greens | To | Debating the Budget proposal of June 2120 |
Message | OOC: Yeah didn't know how to change it without creating again. It has on;y been implemented in the game and everyone can use to test it for the time being. |
Date | 23:52:24, October 04, 2005 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Budget proposal of June 2120 |
Message | It's still in the test phase, so it has no affect on anything yet, which is why any one can propose a spending bill, so we can test it out. |
Date | 02:53:30, October 06, 2005 CET | From | Party of Evil | To | Debating the Budget proposal of June 2120 |
Message | Shift cash from Foreign Affairs to Defence and we'll support this. |
Date | 06:04:08, October 06, 2005 CET | From | Radical Greens | To | Debating the Budget proposal of June 2120 |
Message | foreign affairs also means aid so therefore believe it should stay as is |
Date | 23:51:48, October 07, 2005 CET | From | Alderdath Lebrali Demkratti | To | Debating the Budget proposal of June 2120 |
Message | i can't support this as I can't accept that the HoG should get more than the department of defence |
Date | 02:06:56, October 08, 2005 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Budget proposal of June 2120 |
Message | the LibDems have a good point. (eh, it doesn't affect anything yet, so I don't feel as bad rejecting this at the current time) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 27 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 244 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 34 |
Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368 |
Random quote: "If you're not turned on to politics, politics will turn on you." - Ralph Nader |