We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Additional Judicial Oversight Act (2655)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Social Democratic Republicans
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2655
Description[?]:
| To provide additional judicial oversight to regional courts while maintaining the integrity of judicial federalism. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Current: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Proposed: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:18:03, October 20, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Additional Judicial Oversight Act (2655) |
| Message | Those trained in national law do not always understand the precedent and nature of regional law. |
| Date | 23:02:46, October 20, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the Additional Judicial Oversight Act (2655) |
| Message | Unfortunate, but nessisary sacrifice. |
| Date | 23:12:34, October 20, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Additional Judicial Oversight Act (2655) |
| Message | It's apprent that the NPP supports extremist religious laws and would willfully stand back and allow a woman to be stoned to death just because a community voted to allow it. |
| Date | 20:13:36, October 21, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Additional Judicial Oversight Act (2655) |
| Message | DSP, this bill does not change regional (or religious) law whatsoever. Stop using fallacious arguments. |
| Date | 03:14:09, October 22, 2008 CET | From |  Imperial Pluralism Party | To | Debating the Additional Judicial Oversight Act (2655) |
| Message | DSP, how is that "apprent" at all? |
| Date | 05:14:46, October 22, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Additional Judicial Oversight Act (2655) |
| Message | It's apprent in that they want to allow regions to come up with their own laws on everything and not be judicially held repsonsible to the Federal justice system. Note also that the NPP did not actually refute the accusation either. |
| Date | 22:15:17, October 22, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Additional Judicial Oversight Act (2655) |
| Message | I would have figured the request that you "stop using fallacious arguments" would have made it clear enough that I have "actually refute[d] the accusation". But in case that was too complicated for you: I refute your baseless and false accusations. This bill willl not change the legality of localization at all. This simply changes how local laws are handled in courts. So your entire reasoning system, DSP, is flawed. |
| Date | 00:16:38, October 23, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Additional Judicial Oversight Act (2655) |
| Message | Was'nt meant to be reasonable, I just felt like being randomly aggressive. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 318 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 282 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation. |
| Random quote: "Fascism is a religion. The twentieth century will be known in history as the century of fascism." - Benito Mussolini |