We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2656
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2656
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Federal Republican Party (UCF)
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Union Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Union Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Union Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Union Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Patriciate Imperial League (UCF)
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Federal Republican Party (UCF)
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Mordusian Austrian Union
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Federal Republican Party (UCF)
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Union Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Union Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Union Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Union Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:18:13, October 26, 2008 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2656 |
| Message | No different from the current cabinet, except the ARPs missing positions were filled in. Vacant positions were also filled in. I will resign the cabinet posts with no funding, as per Mordusia tradition. |
| Date | 14:24:16, October 26, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party (UCF) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2656 |
| Message | The FRP supports. |
| Date | 22:19:22, October 26, 2008 CET | From | Ocean Submarine League of Progress | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2656 |
| Message | So, the fourth biggest party gets EIGHT ministries? That hardly seems fair. |
| Date | 23:10:55, October 26, 2008 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2656 |
| Message | The Union Party will resign ministries with no funding. Also, a coalition is the true majority, not parties. Similar ideological parties have the vote split, so a cabinet is the true consensus. Also, socialists are not Mordusians. |
| Date | 02:12:45, October 27, 2008 CET | From | Party of the Wave (AU) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2656 |
| Message | The PotW was not aware that political views determined citizenship now. It appears the UP would prefer just one view in Mordusia: their own. However, the beautiful thing about Mordusia is that we all speak with different voices. The PotW calls Mordusia its home just as much as the UP, and is personally offended that the UP would call many of the PotW\'s supporters \"socialists.\" We all have a voice, and we all have the right to speak freely and provide ideas. That\'s the way government is meant to run. That\'s the way Mordusia has always been, and that\'s the way Mordusia will be. We may disagree on many issues, but we are no less citizens of Mordusia than yourselves. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 95 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 75 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 19 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Liberalism is the transformation of mankind into cattle." - Friedrich Nietzsche |