Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 00:06:02
Server time: 07:53:57, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): luthorian3059 | MyungJak | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Anti-Descrimination Military Service Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hulstrian Labor Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2661

Description[?]:

Ensuring that there is so discrimination in the military acceptance criteria

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:16:25, November 03, 2008 CET
From Hulstrian Labor Party
ToDebating the Anti-Descrimination Military Service Act
MessageOf course, there may be no discrimination in the military at the moment, but what happens if racial anger flares in the high command in the military. We could go backwards.

Date03:27:09, November 04, 2008 CET
From Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei
ToDebating the Anti-Descrimination Military Service Act
MessageThis policy has been around for years and we havn\'t seen any big happenings because of it. Talks of racial flares in the military all of a sudden doesn\'t add up and we will vote against this.

Date07:26:56, November 04, 2008 CET
From Hulstrian Labor Party
ToDebating the Anti-Descrimination Military Service Act
MessageIts just a precaution. Your point is valid, but it\'s better to be safe than sorry.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 214

no
  

Total Seats: 263

abstain
  

Total Seats: 173


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "Were it not for electricity, we would have to watch television in the dark." - Muammar Gaddafi-

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49