We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anti-Descrimination Military Service Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hulstrian Labor Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2661
Description[?]:
Ensuring that there is so discrimination in the military acceptance criteria |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Discrimination in the military on grounds of race/religion.
Old value:: The government does not interfere with the military over who can serve in it.
Current: Any adult citizen can serve in the military, discrimination for racial or religious reasons is prohibited.
Proposed: Any adult citizen can serve in the military, discrimination for racial or religious reasons is prohibited.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 09:16:25, November 03, 2008 CET | From | Hulstrian Labor Party | To | Debating the Anti-Descrimination Military Service Act |
Message | Of course, there may be no discrimination in the military at the moment, but what happens if racial anger flares in the high command in the military. We could go backwards. |
Date | 03:27:09, November 04, 2008 CET | From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Anti-Descrimination Military Service Act |
Message | This policy has been around for years and we havn\'t seen any big happenings because of it. Talks of racial flares in the military all of a sudden doesn\'t add up and we will vote against this. |
Date | 07:26:56, November 04, 2008 CET | From | Hulstrian Labor Party | To | Debating the Anti-Descrimination Military Service Act |
Message | Its just a precaution. Your point is valid, but it\'s better to be safe than sorry. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 214 | |||
no | Total Seats: 263 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 173 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Were it not for electricity, we would have to watch television in the dark." - Muammar Gaddafi- |