We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Limited Labor Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hulstrian Labor Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2661
Description[?]:
| A more realistic version of the HLP labor reform |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The workers' right to strike.
Old value:: All strikes are illegal.
Current: All workers have the right to strike but certain categories of workers regarded as critical to society have to ensure a minimal service.
Proposed: All workers have the right to strike but certain categories of workers regarded as critical to society have to ensure a minimal service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:52:51, November 04, 2008 CET | From | Hulstrian Labor Party | To | Debating the Limited Labor Reform |
| Message | The last reform was the ideal reform for the Labor system. Debate is open to the level of strike action. |
| Date | 12:56:57, November 05, 2008 CET | From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Limited Labor Reform |
| Message | So if this bill passed, then what this will do is divide up the working class in Hulstria by people are \"critical to society\" and those who arent? One has a bigger advantage over another in strikes. This isn\'t reform its a step backwards. |
| Date | 20:58:37, November 05, 2008 CET | From | Hulstrian Labor Party | To | Debating the Limited Labor Reform |
| Message | So you don\'t want our ambulance officers rushing out to save someone with a heart attack, or the police coming to rescue you from a bad situation. Besides, its \"minimal service\" police won\'t take tickets, fireman won\'t rescue kittens from trees, train drivers will be 20 minutes late. This will not break up the working class either, anyone who has a brain realizes that some jobs are required for the well-being of the nation. |
| Date | 03:50:22, November 06, 2008 CET | From | Königstreue Sozialdemokrat 社会民主 | To | Debating the Limited Labor Reform |
| Message | For the FAP to call this is step backwards is absolutely absurd. How is it a step backwards when right now, not one single worker can protest for their rights. This is clearly a step forwards that includes realism that ensures hospitals operate, police enforce laws, and firemen put out fires. |
| Date | 20:10:34, November 06, 2008 CET | From | Konstitutionelle Monarchie Partei | To | Debating the Limited Labor Reform |
| Message | It is a step backwards when your trying to propose strikes be legal but only for some. Either you have strikes where everyone can do it or no strikes at all. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 214 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 372 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost. |
| Random quote: "The opportunity to serve our country, that is all we ask." - John Smith |