We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public safety
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2664
Description[?]:
| Rock festivals must be crushed! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Current: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Proposed: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:33:23, November 09, 2008 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the Public safety |
| Message | There should be no restrictions on the individual rights of citizens! These rights form the cornerstone of democracy as we know it. |
| Date | 18:33:48, November 09, 2008 CET | From | Social Liberal Party | To | Debating the Public safety |
| Message | and rock festivals are awesome! |
| Date | 20:35:44, November 09, 2008 CET | From | NPPE | To | Debating the Public safety |
| Message | No they are not you silly liberal. |
| Date | 00:24:10, November 10, 2008 CET | From | Evergreen Party | To | Debating the Public safety |
| Message | mosh pitting and crowd surfing require a collection of bodies. |
| Date | 05:20:14, November 10, 2008 CET | From | Technocrat Bloc | To | Debating the Public safety |
| Message | Dispersion of a crowd should occur after breaking a law. Then they shoud be dispersed with force. |
| Date | 14:21:46, November 10, 2008 CET | From | NPPE | To | Debating the Public safety |
| Message | The technocrats talk with reason. |
| Date | 05:50:38, November 11, 2008 CET | From | Technocrat Bloc | To | Debating the Public safety |
| Message | I was technically speaking against the proposal... \"potential risk\" isn\'t breaking the law yet. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 134 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 180 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 87 |
| Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640 |
| Random quote: "It is vain to talk of the interest of the community, without understanding what is the interest of the individual" - Jeremy Bentham |