We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear WMD Ban Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Aldurian Libertarian Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2122
Description[?]:
Considering that: A- Nuclear deterent is both a inefective and risky strategy. B- WMD race between nations create a tense situation unfitted for peaceful resolution of conflicts. The Aldurian Republic renounces to produce, buy, sell or stockpile WMD. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Proposed: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:08:00, October 05, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party of Aldurian | To | Debating the Nuclear WMD Ban Act |
Message | The only thing about not producing them i find to be a bad idea is others will still have them. I do agree with not buying or selling. I do however atleast feel we should have a limited stockpile. |
Date | 01:18:35, October 06, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Communist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear WMD Ban Act |
Message | I believe that we should ban nuclear weapons. If another nation uses them, it is bad enough. We should not use them in response, even if it means we lose a war. Losing our independence is a small price to pay in order to preserve the health of our planet. Even if we lose the war, that is better than destroying the entire world. At least then we can have a chance to someday rebuild. I am a strong supporter of national defense, but nuclear weapons are not like other, convetional weapons. They do not simply kill they people they are dropped on. They spread radioactive fallout all over the planet, causing immense harm to people all over the world, and also causes untold environmental devastation. There is absolutely no justification for the use of nuclear weapons. We will vote in favor of this bill. |
Date | 02:38:17, October 06, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear WMD Ban Act |
Message | >The only thing about not producing them i find to be a bad idea is others will still have them. I do agree with not buying or selling. I do however atleast feel we should have a limited stockpile. One of the aims of the bill is to prevent nuclear race. |
Date | 16:53:26, October 06, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party of Aldurian | To | Debating the Nuclear WMD Ban Act |
Message | I work like to see this changed...still. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 300 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval. |
Random quote: "When anger rises, think of the consequences." - Confucius |