Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:07:18
Server time: 18:52:41, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Mindus | VojmatDunDSU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Gov.0033.2664

Details

Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2665

Description[?]:

In order to make sure that we have enough available funds at any given time without being forced into debt we propose the following changes to the income tax code under a progressive taxation system.

Note that at the end of each year (under DSP governments atleast) the remaining surplus money is to be redistributed back to the people, especially the lower classes.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:57:30, November 12, 2008 CET
From United Land Movement
ToDebating the Gov.0033.2664
MessageWhy do you have double percentage brackets? couldn\'t you just use one bracket.

Date04:29:36, November 12, 2008 CET
From Liberal Social Democratic Republicans
ToDebating the Gov.0033.2664
MessageWe approve but will submit our own alternative.

Date05:36:08, November 12, 2008 CET
From 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Gov.0033.2664
MessageThe double brackets are to cover income areas, rather then a certain income.

LSDR, only the minister of inance may propose spending and/or tax legislation.

Date08:42:27, November 12, 2008 CET
From United Land Movement
ToDebating the Gov.0033.2664
MessageYou misunderstand me.

> 40,000 SEK 35% 14,886,000,000 SEK
> 45,000 SEK 35% 13,478,000,000 SEK
> 50,000 SEK 35% 13,478,000,000 SEK

you are taxing 3 different greater than groups >40k, >45k, >50k all at 35%. Since 45k and 50k are both greater than 40k isn\'t this a bit redundant, since it could be achieved by just placing >40k at 35%, and then having your next percentile increase at > 55k be 40% do exactly the same thing with fewer brackets? or am I missing something terribly less obvious?

Date10:28:35, November 12, 2008 CET
From Normand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Gov.0033.2664
MessageGreat, increase taxes by 20%.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 326

no
 

Total Seats: 79

abstain
   

Total Seats: 195


Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account.

Random quote: "Entrepreneurs are simply those who understand that there is little difference between obstacle and opportunity and are able to turn both to their advantage." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 213