Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5475
Next month in: 02:57:00
Server time: 21:02:59, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Autokrator30 | dnobb | FireboyUK | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Constitutional Amendement 2665

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Progressive Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2666

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:04:21, November 14, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendement 2665
MessageNo way Aldegar is turning a presidential state.

Date19:03:32, November 15, 2008 CET
FromProgress Party
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendement 2665
MessageArticle #3 is a sound one, however, we in the Progress Party can not subject to such the former articles. They are a constant reminder of the freedom which the Local Democracy beholds, and should at all times have.

Date22:58:19, November 15, 2008 CET
FromLiberal Progressive Party
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendement 2665
MessageThis act attempts to remove the expensive duplication of government and services in our nation. Do our citizens really require that much governing? Surely a democratically elected government at national level is enough. You discuss freedom. What about freedom from government? Do we trust our citizens to run their own lives with minimal influence from the government, or do we need to legislate on every thing they do? Citizens are able to participate fully in the election of the national government, ensuring democracy is not denied.

Date07:56:33, November 16, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendement 2665
MessageExcept for Article 3, the proposals only INCREASE the power of the central government. Some of the powers taken from local governments, some from the people.

Date06:57:51, November 17, 2008 CET
FromLiberal Progressive Party
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendement 2665
MessageWe fail to see what the issue is. The Green Party of Aldegar\'s voting record re centralization is unitarist-leaning. How does this bill differ from your position? If Aldegar had just one level of government, at the national level, this would remove duplication of services which cost our citizens money. Reduced red tape, uniform national standards, and increased accountability - no more blaming local/regional/national government and no more passing the buck.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 328

no
   

Total Seats: 346

abstain
    

Total Seats: 76


Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302

Random quote: "The day is not far off when the economic problem will take the back seat where it belongs, and the arena of the heart and the head will be occupied or reoccupied, by our real problems, the problems of life and of human relations, of creation and behaviour and religion." - John Maynard Keynes

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66