We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Passport Protection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2667
Description[?]:
| Fools can not be allowed to represent Mordusia abroad. This will protect our reputation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Travel by nationals to foreign nations
Old value:: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Current: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Proposed: The nation issues passports to nationals after an invasive security check.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:13:58, November 16, 2008 CET | From | Ocean Submarine League of Progress | To | Debating the Passport Protection Act |
| Message | Define \'invasive\'. |
| Date | 20:37:17, November 16, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party (UCF) | To | Debating the Passport Protection Act |
| Message | We are unsure about this proposal. Why would we want to make it difficult for Mordusians to travel abroad? |
| Date | 22:45:03, November 16, 2008 CET | From | Mordusian Austrian Union | To | Debating the Passport Protection Act |
| Message | We wouldn\'t, unless we were trying to force them to stay here because of a tyrannical government. And considering the draft the UP is proposing, we feel that is exactly what is going on here. |
| Date | 02:54:55, November 17, 2008 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Passport Protection Act |
| Message | Invasive means more strict than just a superficial check. We do not want to be held accountable for what idiots do overseas, and create an international incident. If a Mordusian ends up in trouble, we would have to intervene on their behalf. Those with nothing to hide have nothing to fear. |
| Date | 15:40:45, November 17, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party (UCF) | To | Debating the Passport Protection Act |
| Message | We do not agree with that statement, individuals have the right to privacy, and a person has the right not to be harassed by government officials. The FRP opposes this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 85 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 152 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 28 |
| Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "We have a culture, a strong, vibrant, 'real' culture. Most of the outside world does not. They haven't bled enough for it." - Lászlo Nádašdy, former Deltarian nobleman |