We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Financial Equality
Details
Submitted by[?]: DPRP
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2667
Description[?]:
There will be an absolute maximum amount of money an individual can have, if anyone has above this amount, the money will be taken and used to improve the live\'s of people in a poorer financial situation, ensuring financial equality. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:06:49, November 16, 2008 CET |
From | DPRP | To | Debating the Financial Equality | Message | Communist or not, bums are not accepted in this society! |
Date | 23:23:06, November 16, 2008 CET |
From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the Financial Equality | Message | I am no bum. Notify ye\'self ya scurvey billed rat!!!
Just because I will not support communism in Beluzia, that doesnt make me a bum. I have seen plenty of civil warfare caused because of communism. I enjoy civil war, simply because I get to teach the scumbags that support communism, replublicanism and satanism, the lesson of their lives! |
Date | 23:34:04, November 16, 2008 CET |
From | DPRP | To | Debating the Financial Equality | Message | Please tell me Sir, when did either of our paties admit to being communist? |
Date | 00:03:50, November 17, 2008 CET |
From | DPRP | To | Debating the Financial Equality | Message | Please tell me Sir, when did either of our paties admit to being communist? |
Date | 12:06:41, November 17, 2008 CET |
From | Constitutional Monarchy Party | To | Debating the Financial Equality | Message | You didnt, nor should you. That is of course, unless you wish to be hunted by Pirates, and the Peoples Youth. Your policies alone make you communist, redistributing wealth? madness! |
Date | 12:54:18, November 17, 2008 CET |
From | DPRP | To | Debating the Financial Equality | Message | It's all for the greater good |
Date | 18:32:14, November 18, 2008 CET |
From | DPRP | To | Debating the Financial Equality | Message | It does not appear that way! |
Date | 21:13:00, November 18, 2008 CET |
From | DPRP | To | Debating the Financial Equality | Message | I am ashamed of you, the National socialists |
Date | 21:13:18, November 18, 2008 CET |
From | DPRP | To | Debating the Financial Equality | Message | I am ashamed of you, the National socialists |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
Vote |
Seats |
yes | Total Seats: 125 |
no | Total Seats: 260 |
abstain | Total Seats: 365 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "The activist is not the man who says the river is dirty. The activist is the man who cleans up the river." - Ross Perot |