Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5475
Next month in: 02:28:32
Server time: 13:31:27, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): JourneyJak | Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Income tax proposal of May 2667

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Progressive Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2668

Description[?]:

The Liberal Progressive Party propose to adjust the government's income tax policy to better address the economic situation of the Second Republic of Aldegar.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:02:36, November 18, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of May 2667
MessageAnd you call yourself 'liberal'.

Date14:34:36, November 18, 2008 CET
FromProgress Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of May 2667
MessageCut taxes. Not raise them. Not much of a consistent party you have there. 90 % is only going to lead to more loopholes, and eventually rich people will reside elsewhere, blatantly asinine.

Date00:42:32, November 19, 2008 CET
FromLiberal Progressive Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of May 2667
MessageWhere does it say that liberalism means you support tax cuts? People have this weird world view where they expect, no, demand government fix problems, yet they are extremely unwilling to have to pay for them. This is not a permanent measure. It is necessary to fund increased investment in our country. You have to look beyond the immediate political aspects and take a look at the big picture.

Date03:05:00, November 19, 2008 CET
FromGreen Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of May 2667
MessageBut are those increased investments (those u proposed) necessary?
And taxing this high is even unacceptable for us left wing hippies.

Date08:03:12, November 19, 2008 CET
FromLiberal Progressive Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of May 2667
MessageYes. These taxes are necessary in order to have the funds to allow our nation to repair and rebuild neglected infrastructure, as well as expand on new facilities. Again, this will be a one off, finance and taxes will be adjusted in line with the nations needs. It is not the policy of the Liberal Progressive Party to let Aldegar stagnate. Infrastructure investment will boost productivity and employment, which in turns creates more funds available to the government through taxes, which means there may be increased funding for other items on the budget. Maybe even this new 'environment' thing you hippies keep on about.

Date17:38:20, November 19, 2008 CET
FromProgress Party
ToDebating the Income tax proposal of May 2667
MessageWe don't need to boom up the budget and use enormous sums at once, and make every rich investor travel to other countries and invest. If you want infrastructure, then you should increase the funding, but not by half of the budget. That's just ridiculous.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 105

no
  

Total Seats: 205

abstain
    

Total Seats: 440


Random fact: Never use the same password as a friend. If two or more active accounts use the same password, they will be inactivated.

Random quote: "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." - Voltaire

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 137