We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: New Party Bill 2121
Details
Submitted by[?]: Keymon Ruling Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2122
Description[?]:
| I have recieved an application from another player to join in with the politics of this jolly little nation. And in not setting a precident at all, I thought that I would seek your views on the matter. Oh, and he can post on the thread as well I guess. Here is the party in question: http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewparty.php?partyid=1403 That reminds me, is it BB code or HTML that works on here? |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:58:03, October 06, 2005 CET | From | Keymon Ruling Party | To | Debating the New Party Bill 2121 |
| Message | I am all for the inclusion of new parties, but I would say that this should be the last pro-market party that we let in. Personally I'd quite like some loonie-leftie party for us to interact with. Only one mind, we don't want them getting too big for their boots or anything now do we? |
| Date | 18:19:28, October 06, 2005 CET | From | Manifest Destiny Party | To | Debating the New Party Bill 2121 |
| Message | I agree. |
| Date | 23:09:54, October 06, 2005 CET | From | Keymon Libertarian Alliance | To | Debating the New Party Bill 2121 |
| Message | I sort of like the balence of power the way it is... i mean, if this were a wacky commie.. i would be more inclined to vote yes... but this is just going to be a clone of the KRA and I dont feel we need that. Therefore I vote no. |
| Date | 23:10:19, October 06, 2005 CET | From | Keymon Libertarian Alliance | To | Debating the New Party Bill 2121 |
| Message | KRP I mean |
| Date | 08:33:05, October 07, 2005 CET | From | Keymon Ruling Party | To | Debating the New Party Bill 2121 |
| Message | Good point actually, but where should we draw the line? I definately don't want eight parties here, as its difficuilt enough to get anything done in Dolgaria, and I don't want Keymon to boil down into silly 'ok private schools are banned, now they aren't' see-saw bill voting. Having a whacky commie would obviously give us all something that we can vote against, thus ensuring that our visibility's dlon't disapear... Hmm, tricky. Personally I would like to see a fourth, and maybe a fifth party here, just to make things more intersting. I mean I can't be arsed to propose many bills, but I'll certainly vote on those that others propose ;-) I'll let him speak for him-(or I guess her I suppose)-self, I'll PM the bill address to him so that he can do so. If it comes to it, a show of hands rather than a vote will do, and feel free to give him a grilling. Oh and of course this is all completely non-binding of course, the final decision is of course mine. Well I did pay for this place didn't I? ;-) |
| Date | 08:33:46, October 07, 2005 CET | From | Keymon Ruling Party | To | Debating the New Party Bill 2121 |
| Message | I noticed yesterday that the addition of an 'A' would be a very bad thing for my party. Oh well.... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 452 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 298 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "The liberal state is a mask behind which there is no face; it is a scaffolding behind which there is no building." - Benito Mussolini |