We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: AFRP: Securing the nations interests at home and abroad
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anti-Free Radical Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2669
Description[?]:
| The state should own all defence industries. We believe that this is important because the state, in times of trouble, should not have to compete with armed rogue groups that could possible start from these private defence groups. (a discussion on this bill would be nice) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: The state owns all defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns all defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:51:03, November 19, 2008 CET | From | Selucian Home and Hearth | To | Debating the AFRP: Securing the nations interests at home and abroad |
| Message | We are inclined to support this bill because the existence of private defense contractors causes a lot of legal hassling that goes on when agreements are reached between countries in arms or working together. |
| Date | 00:35:54, November 20, 2008 CET | From | Selucian Party of Social Democrats | To | Debating the AFRP: Securing the nations interests at home and abroad |
| Message | We oppose this bill. |
| Date | 03:37:26, November 20, 2008 CET | From | Free Radical Party | To | Debating the AFRP: Securing the nations interests at home and abroad |
| Message | We support this bill. Contractors are more "cow boys" than standard government employees, we feel that by having all soldiers and personnel employed by the government it will improve our image abroad. |
| Date | 17:11:54, November 20, 2008 CET | From | Minarchist Party | To | Debating the AFRP: Securing the nations interests at home and abroad |
| Message | I side with the Democratic Majority in opposing this bill. How can the Free Radical Party subscribe to radical freedom while pushing for more governmental control? Government does not have the incentives for efficiency that the free market has. Please see my bill on this related issue. |
| Date | 22:41:36, November 20, 2008 CET | From | Minarchist Party | To | Debating the AFRP: Securing the nations interests at home and abroad |
| Message | * Free Radical Party (141) * Anti-Free Radical Party (25) Politics does make the most interesting of bedfellows, eh? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 311 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 92 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page |
| Random quote: "In our age, there is no such thing as 'keeping out of politics.' All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia." - George Orwell |