Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5476
Next month in: 01:25:10
Server time: 14:34:49, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | dannypk19 | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of April 2668

Details

Submitted by[?]: Union Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2668

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:35:36, November 20, 2008 CET
FromPatriciate Imperial League (UCF)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2668
MessagePrincess Mary Talon-Mordus XI thanks the UP for their willingness to re-enter into a coalition, despite the decisions made by our previous leadership.

Date03:13:41, November 20, 2008 CET
FromMordusian Green Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2668
MessageThe Green Party isn't so happy with Article 4.

Date03:49:24, November 20, 2008 CET
FromUnion Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2668
MessageWe thank the PIL for returning to their true coalition.


Date04:58:30, November 20, 2008 CET
FromOcean Submarine League of Progress
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2668
MessageUm, why does the UP get to be the Head of Government when, let's see, one, two, three, four parties are larger than it is?
And alienating the largest party in Parliament isn't all "we love freedom and democracy" now is it?

Date06:53:32, November 20, 2008 CET
FromFederal Republican Party (UCF)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2668
MessageWe support but would like the title of hog after next elections.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 136

no
   

Total Seats: 113

abstain
 

Total Seats: 16


Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

Random quote: "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." - George W. Bush

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66