We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Consistency in energy policy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Cooperative Commonwealth Federation
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2123
Description[?]:
| Since energy is properly a local government concern, let's leave the nuclear non-policy to local governments too. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Current: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Proposed: The decision is left up to local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:32:43, October 08, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Consistency in energy policy |
| Message | Supported consistent with our devolutionist policy. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 122 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 156 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats. |
| Random quote: "It is said, 'Pontesi is Jelbic in nature'. But I tell you, they are really a lost tribe of Selucians, forced to become barbarians by their savage Jelbic conquerors." - Alamar Xarfaxis, former Pontesian politician |