Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 01:02:32
Server time: 22:57:27, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): burgerboys | Klexi | luthorian3059 | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Utilizing all options at our disposal

Details

Submitted by[?]: Tuesday Is Coming

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2124

Description[?]:

If any nation shall attack Lodamun, we authorize our military to take any action determined to facilitate the defense of Lodamun.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:42:48, October 07, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Utilizing all options at our disposal
Messagethe usual question: we will even sell arms to Deltaria?

Date18:35:13, October 07, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Utilizing all options at our disposal
MessageSure.

Date05:47:42, October 10, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Utilizing all options at our disposal
MessageThe government will not, however. We will not prevent others from doing so.

Date11:18:40, October 10, 2005 CET
FromLodamun Centre-Left Coalition
ToDebating the Utilizing all options at our disposal
MessageNo to all but the nuclear one...

Date17:40:39, October 10, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Utilizing all options at our disposal
MessageThe nuclear one would violate the declaration of peace, which says we will not attack first.

Date18:12:49, October 10, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Utilizing all options at our disposal
MessageThe nuclear one doesnt have to violate the declaration of peace. Together, it would mean that we dont have to wait for someone to nuke us before we hit them. We just have to wait for them to attack us.
Then we would be able to do whatever, once they hit us with anything.

Date01:26:31, October 11, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Utilizing all options at our disposal
Messagewouldn't that value be "we will not use nuclear weapons unless attacked" rather than "The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason"? That value sounds like first strike authorization. Does a value exist for "only in self-defence"? It probably should, if it doesn't.

Date01:31:10, October 11, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Utilizing all options at our disposal
MessageThe current law only allows us to use them if we are nuked. The proposed law here would allow us to use them for any reason. However, "Declaration of Peace" would also be in effect, meaning that we can only use them if we are attacked.

Both laws affect the hypothetical situation.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 55

no
     

Total Seats: 202

abstain
  

Total Seats: 43


Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass.

Random quote: "The United States is in no sense founded upon the Christian doctrine." - George Washington

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 79