Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:55:08
Server time: 20:04:51, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Capital Punishment

Details

Submitted by[?]: Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2675

Description[?]:

"It is by exacting the highest penalty for the taking of human life that we affirm the highest value of human life."

Once a convicted murderer is executed, there is no chance that he will break out of jail and kill or injure someone ever again. In addition, once a convicted murder is executed, there will be no further maintenance costs to the state.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:35:23, December 02, 2008 CET
From The Peoples Liberal Movement
ToDebating the Capital Punishment
MessageWe strongly oppose.

Date19:04:30, December 02, 2008 CET
From Party One
ToDebating the Capital Punishment
MessageWe could support, though we don't favor decentralization in most instances.

Frontier Party's "Public Crucifixion: A Salve for an Injured Nation" campaign may not have won us many new admirers in the last few elections, but we remain committed to the just and compassionate practice of putting as many SAridanian criminals to their fitting demise as befits the economy.

Date21:16:26, December 02, 2008 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Capital Punishment
MessageAlright we'll centralize it

Date02:43:09, December 04, 2008 CET
From National Farmer's Union of Saridan
ToDebating the Capital Punishment
MessageThe NFU believe in decentralization and allow local governments to have more power. That is why we have voted no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 235

no
    

Total Seats: 515

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "Freedom is not America's gift to the world. It is God's gift to humanity. " - George W. Bush

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 60