Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5477
Next month in: 01:00:12
Server time: 02:59:47, May 01, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2677

Details

Submitted by[?]: Kirlawan People's Justice Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2678

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:00:08, December 08, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan People's Justice Party
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2677
MessageJust proposing to share the available cabinet positions among all four of Kirlawa's remaining parties,
inspired by a recent suggestion by the SPK:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=230265

Requests for ministry swaps, etc., are always welcome.

Date06:00:18, December 09, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan People's Justice Party
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2677
MessageThank you everyone!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 717

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

      Random quote: "No one today can afford to be innocent, or indulge himself in ignorance of contemporary governments, politics and social orders. The national polities of the modern world maintain their existence by deliberately fostered craving and fear: monstrous protection rackets. The 'free world' has become economically dependent on a fantastic system of stimulation of greed which cannot be fulfilled, sexual desire which cannot be satiated and hatred which has no outlet except against oneself, the persons one is supposed to love, or the revolutionary aspirations of pitiful, poverty-stricken marginal societies like Cuba or Vietnam. The conditions of the Cold War have turned all modern societies - communist included - into vicious distorters of man's true potential." - Gary Snyder

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 53